Sunday, January 31, 2010

The New World Disorder.


Over the past several weeks a few have asked me a very important question...Why???

Why would a government carry such attacks out, on their own people?
What would be obtained by doing this?
What do these people (society members) want in the end?
Have they always done this?
Why don't more people know?

These are all very good questions, and here are my simple and modest answers. First off, I would suggest reading the following definition and visiting the following video link and listen to what Professor Sutton says about these groups. He was one of the best scholars involved in researching this particular subject matter, and what is most interesting is the fact that he was making these statements, which are very relevant today, back in 1982-83.
He speaks of the New World Order, their objectives and the means by which they achieve these. He also mentions how these same groups were even then already building up the Communist Chinese government in order to lead the world into this future conflict with these governments.
Is China powerful today?? Are the geopolitical sands shifting today??
Mr. Sutton knew exactly how these groups function and have functioned for hundreds of years.
If we even look to the U.S.'s own colonial history, we find how these false flag events were even carried out prior to the Revolutionary war. The whole Boston Tea Party was done under the guise that it had been carried out by the Native American groups.
Throughout most of the last 300 years in world history, we see how starting with the English Revolution, to the French Revolution, to the American Revolution, these groups (secret society/Illuminati) have always been the atheistic forces behind the taking and sacking of monarchies and theocracies throughout the past 3 centuries.
After these 3 main revolutions, the rest of Central and South American followed, all aided and supported by these masonic groups. Most every first president in all of these central and south American countries was a Mason. Even every Mexican president, since the 1810 Revolution (who the masons helped support and plan) has been a mason.
Their one world agenda has always been to have a one world government under their control, and if you think about it, they are pretty close to achieving this.
Even the Bolshevik Revolution, that began in Russia, under Lenin's leadership was supported and funded by these Illuminati groups. Their aim again was to overthrow Czar Nicholas' Romanov's rule of Russia, and they did!
Every major and even minor revolutionary movement throughout the past three centuries has had some form of Masonic/Illuminati involvement, through monetary, military, and/or other forms of support.
Both world wars also were funded and created in order for the advancement of their agenda. This is why the U.N. was created after these wars, to further facilitate this goal. Also, in 1913, the Federal Reserve central bank was created in order to further facilitate a one world banking system.
If you think about it, after WWII, most of the world had, through the Illuminati's efforts, gotten rid of most monarchy and/or theocratic governments. This further helped pave the way towards achieving their final objective...a new world order that would operate under their complete control.
But then, the only last bastion of theocratic ruled countries was left. Where you might ask??? I'm glad you asked, for it is none other than most Islamic countries.
For these are the last countries that stand in their way, and not only do they stand in their way towards achieving this one world government, but also they are the ones that just happen to sit on some of the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world.
We are now living in some very dangerous times, for even though these groups usually control both sides of the conflict and the source of this conflict, there have been times when they either under estimated or overestimated leaders they helped to create, only to be attacked by these monsters of their own creation. The first major one was Napoleon, and then Hitler.
If you note, that in both world wars, Switzerland (home to the Societies banking system) declared itself neutral, and neither side, in both wars touched Switzerland, because they were funding both sides!!!
I too feel this will be the case in this coming war, but I also believe they have underestimated Russia and China's combined might, or perhaps confusing that their objectives are the same as the Russians and the Chinese.
Their objectives are never halted due to a loss of life, even if that loss of life has come as a result of their own false flag attacks, because they view the over all objectives as a greater end that has to be achieved regardless of how dirty the means might be.
I would also say that the main, or biggest reason more people do not know about the operation of these groups is because they always keep the mass' attention diverted in other ways. Back in the 1700's it was clearly due to just plain ignorance on behalf of the masses, but today, when we should supposedly be educated and enlightened, they still keep the masses in dark ignorance through entertainment mainly, and through a firm control on the education system as well.
I hope this brief synopsis and the following information help to shed some light and answer some questions. Thank you all and God bless always.


Anthony Sutton's explanation of how these societies use conflict and to what ends. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuC5FfkY7XY&feature=related


http://pledgeforamerica.com/2.html

"False flag terrorism" is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames.

Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.


The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy's flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a "false flag" attack.

There are many examples of false flag attacks through history. For example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own government building and blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.
In the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government. See also this confirmation.

The Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power (see also this short essay and this report).
And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming it on a rebel group in order to justify a crackdown on that group.
Indeed, even Muslim governments appear to play this game. For example, the well-respected former Indonesian president said that the government had a role in the Bali bombings.

This sounds nuts, right? You've never heard of this "false flag terrorism", where a government attacks its own people then blames others in order to justify its goals, right? And you are cynical of the statements discussed above?

Please take a look at these historical quotes:

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." - Plato"

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - U.S. President James Madison

"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death". - Adolph Hitler

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened". - Josef Stalin

But NOT the U.S....Right?

It is logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so.
Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see also this essay).
And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Moreover, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

But Al-Qaeda is Different,right?

You might say "But Al-Qaeda is different -- powerful, organized, and out to get us", right? Maybe, but take a look at this Los Angeles Times Article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled "The Power of Nightmares", which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype).

Also a former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative". And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute -- cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view)? See also this TV news report.

And did you know that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11?
And did you know that, many years after the FBI first stated that it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11, the agency apparently still does not have any hard evidence linking Bin Laden to the crime (see also this partial confirmation by the Washington Post)?
And did you see the statement by the CIA commander in charge of the capture that the U.S. LET Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?
And have you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and this one).

It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence, but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.
Even the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation"(the audio is here)

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following very smart people are saying:

A former prominent republican U.S. congressman stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the current administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.

Current republican U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".

A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation. The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, has said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"***

A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag.
General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government".

Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

No comments:

Post a Comment