Sunday, January 31, 2010

The New World Disorder.


Over the past several weeks a few have asked me a very important question...Why???

Why would a government carry such attacks out, on their own people?
What would be obtained by doing this?
What do these people (society members) want in the end?
Have they always done this?
Why don't more people know?

These are all very good questions, and here are my simple and modest answers. First off, I would suggest reading the following definition and visiting the following video link and listen to what Professor Sutton says about these groups. He was one of the best scholars involved in researching this particular subject matter, and what is most interesting is the fact that he was making these statements, which are very relevant today, back in 1982-83.
He speaks of the New World Order, their objectives and the means by which they achieve these. He also mentions how these same groups were even then already building up the Communist Chinese government in order to lead the world into this future conflict with these governments.
Is China powerful today?? Are the geopolitical sands shifting today??
Mr. Sutton knew exactly how these groups function and have functioned for hundreds of years.
If we even look to the U.S.'s own colonial history, we find how these false flag events were even carried out prior to the Revolutionary war. The whole Boston Tea Party was done under the guise that it had been carried out by the Native American groups.
Throughout most of the last 300 years in world history, we see how starting with the English Revolution, to the French Revolution, to the American Revolution, these groups (secret society/Illuminati) have always been the atheistic forces behind the taking and sacking of monarchies and theocracies throughout the past 3 centuries.
After these 3 main revolutions, the rest of Central and South American followed, all aided and supported by these masonic groups. Most every first president in all of these central and south American countries was a Mason. Even every Mexican president, since the 1810 Revolution (who the masons helped support and plan) has been a mason.
Their one world agenda has always been to have a one world government under their control, and if you think about it, they are pretty close to achieving this.
Even the Bolshevik Revolution, that began in Russia, under Lenin's leadership was supported and funded by these Illuminati groups. Their aim again was to overthrow Czar Nicholas' Romanov's rule of Russia, and they did!
Every major and even minor revolutionary movement throughout the past three centuries has had some form of Masonic/Illuminati involvement, through monetary, military, and/or other forms of support.
Both world wars also were funded and created in order for the advancement of their agenda. This is why the U.N. was created after these wars, to further facilitate this goal. Also, in 1913, the Federal Reserve central bank was created in order to further facilitate a one world banking system.
If you think about it, after WWII, most of the world had, through the Illuminati's efforts, gotten rid of most monarchy and/or theocratic governments. This further helped pave the way towards achieving their final objective...a new world order that would operate under their complete control.
But then, the only last bastion of theocratic ruled countries was left. Where you might ask??? I'm glad you asked, for it is none other than most Islamic countries.
For these are the last countries that stand in their way, and not only do they stand in their way towards achieving this one world government, but also they are the ones that just happen to sit on some of the world's largest oil and gas reserves in the world.
We are now living in some very dangerous times, for even though these groups usually control both sides of the conflict and the source of this conflict, there have been times when they either under estimated or overestimated leaders they helped to create, only to be attacked by these monsters of their own creation. The first major one was Napoleon, and then Hitler.
If you note, that in both world wars, Switzerland (home to the Societies banking system) declared itself neutral, and neither side, in both wars touched Switzerland, because they were funding both sides!!!
I too feel this will be the case in this coming war, but I also believe they have underestimated Russia and China's combined might, or perhaps confusing that their objectives are the same as the Russians and the Chinese.
Their objectives are never halted due to a loss of life, even if that loss of life has come as a result of their own false flag attacks, because they view the over all objectives as a greater end that has to be achieved regardless of how dirty the means might be.
I would also say that the main, or biggest reason more people do not know about the operation of these groups is because they always keep the mass' attention diverted in other ways. Back in the 1700's it was clearly due to just plain ignorance on behalf of the masses, but today, when we should supposedly be educated and enlightened, they still keep the masses in dark ignorance through entertainment mainly, and through a firm control on the education system as well.
I hope this brief synopsis and the following information help to shed some light and answer some questions. Thank you all and God bless always.


Anthony Sutton's explanation of how these societies use conflict and to what ends. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuC5FfkY7XY&feature=related


http://pledgeforamerica.com/2.html

"False flag terrorism" is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames.

Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.


The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy's flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a "false flag" attack.

There are many examples of false flag attacks through history. For example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own government building and blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.
In the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government. See also this confirmation.

The Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power (see also this short essay and this report).
And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming it on a rebel group in order to justify a crackdown on that group.
Indeed, even Muslim governments appear to play this game. For example, the well-respected former Indonesian president said that the government had a role in the Bali bombings.

This sounds nuts, right? You've never heard of this "false flag terrorism", where a government attacks its own people then blames others in order to justify its goals, right? And you are cynical of the statements discussed above?

Please take a look at these historical quotes:

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." - Plato"

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - U.S. President James Madison

"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death". - Adolph Hitler

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

"The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened". - Josef Stalin

But NOT the U.S....Right?

It is logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so.
Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see also this essay).
And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Moreover, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

But Al-Qaeda is Different,right?

You might say "But Al-Qaeda is different -- powerful, organized, and out to get us", right? Maybe, but take a look at this Los Angeles Times Article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled "The Power of Nightmares", which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype).

Also a former National Security Adviser told the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative". And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute -- cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view)? See also this TV news report.

And did you know that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11?
And did you know that, many years after the FBI first stated that it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11, the agency apparently still does not have any hard evidence linking Bin Laden to the crime (see also this partial confirmation by the Washington Post)?
And did you see the statement by the CIA commander in charge of the capture that the U.S. LET Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?
And have you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer; and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and this one).

It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence, but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.
Even the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation"(the audio is here)

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following very smart people are saying:

A former prominent republican U.S. congressman stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the current administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.

Current republican U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated that the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse". He also said "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran".

A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation. The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, has said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"***

A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag.
General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government".

Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

U.S. places Iran in their Sights.

The following article from today's DEBKA file report further confirms the march towards what will be a strike on Iran's nuclear installations. The only thing that is needed know is the false flag event that will create the "knee jerk" reaction from the American public that will cry out for revenge against Iran (the event will somehow be tied to Iran, just like 911 was also tied to Iraq).
The preparations are being made, and the ground work being laid in order to carry this attack out on Iran.
The Russians and Chinese know this too, this is why Haiti (hence the reason there are now over 20, 000 U.S. troops there) is going to be key, in order to cut off any possible military aid to Cuba or Venezuela in the Caribbean. For it was back in November of 2008 that a couple of Russian warships made a trip to Venezuela, El Salvador and Cuba, as Russia made a symbolic trip into the U.S.'s sphere of influence. A not so veiled show of force to the U.S., after the U.S. sent a few of its warships into the Black sea, in support of Georgia, after Georgia and Russia had a small armed conflict over Ossetia, a break away region from Georgia.


The article refers to a possible attack from Iran, but the truth is that Iran is smarter than this and they do not have full capabilities for carrying this attack out on Israel. They will not be the ones to attack first.




US speeds up its own and Gulf allies' preparations for clash with Iran


DEBKAfile Special Report January 31, 2010, 12:27 AM (GMT+02:00)
Gulf Emirates military deployment Saudi Arabia US-Iran

Aegis, US anti-missile missile image above.

The Obama administration took the unusual step Saturday night, Jan. 30, of leaking word to major US media that the United States, Saudi Arabia and Gulf allies - the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain - have accelerated the deployment of new defenses against possible Iranian missile attacks. They are preparing for Iran, or its surrogate Hizballah, to hit back for a possible US or strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. debkafile's US military sources confirm that Washington plans to treble the 10,000-strong US troop contingent, already present in Saudi Arabia for guarding its oil fields and port facilities against medium or short-range Iranian missile attack, or sabotage by Hizballah marine units trained for their mission by Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps.Additional US Aegis missile interceptor cruisers with advanced radar and anti-missile systems were also reported to be heading for round-the-clock patrol around Iranian shores, with more Patriot anti-missile missiles to reinforce the eight batteries already deployed in the four emirates.The Obama administration set these exceptional steps in motion, debkafile reports, in anticipation of nuclear provocations from Tehran while the regime celebrates the 31st anniversary of the Islamic revolution from Feb.1-11.President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promised to announce Iran's attainment of a 20 percent uranium enrichment capability, a short step to weapons grade material.
Some high-ranking Revolutionary Guards officers have also said that Iran will parade a new type of surface missile during the celebrations, without revealing its features, while Iranian space scientists predicted the launch of a new spy satellite of the Toloo series.All this was taken in Washington as a challenge that could not be left without an appropriate response. Administration officials also feared that Israel might be goaded into going forward with a military operation against Iran's nuclear facilities. The Gulf Arab states were in need of reassurance too.The White House's decision to deploy additional defenses in the Gulf came only a day after National Security Adviser James Jones warned that Iran was liable to react to pressure by having its proxies Hizballah and Hamas attack Israel. The abruptness of this step pointed to the administration having woken up to the realization that its diplomatic and military position in the region was in grave jeopardy and in dire need of shoring up without delay.

Friday, January 29, 2010

False Flag Attack in Vancouver???

I just found the following article on infowars.com that points to something quite disturbing that could be something important or nothing at all, but I felt I would share it with you all.
The author of this article makes a lot of the same references I have shared with you all regarding how these secret society groups create the problem, reaction, and solution formula in order to advance their objectives.

Also keep in mind the number sequences I emailed to some of you in early January regarding certain key dates that would add up to 6.

February 19, 2010=15=1+5=6. This date also happens to be a Friday, 6th day of the week. The only thing left would be the time, which could perhaps be 6pm and then we would have the triple 6, a number synonymous with evil and evil acts.
Also, in the movies, Sherlock Holmes, Knowing and Watchmen (although there are probably more recent movies with this number) there is also 12noon or 12 midnight that is given in the movies as an ominous time for something big happening. Of course 12 midnight is symbolic because according to the Doomsday Clock, once the hands reach 12 midnight, it is the start of a nuclear war, becuase according to the scientist that are in charge of this clock, 12 midnight would indicate that somewhere in the world there has been a nuclear weapon used against another country and/or city.



January 29, 2010




WARNING: I now believe I have reasonable grounds to suspect there may be a “false flag” attack carried out during the Olympics in Canada. The games will take place in Vancouver and Whistler from Feb. 12th until Feb. 28th. Below, I have compiled the following suspicious activity by searching and analyzing the news from various media sources and by speaking with citizens in Canada themselves.
In my opinion, an attack on the Olympics while it is being highly guarded would be the perfect way to bring in more police state measure and to more fully integrate the US and Canada into a functioning North American Union. But the question remains, is that really what is happening right now?
I hope you will look at the information and make up your own mind as to what pattern you see unfolding, any information provided is for analytical and educational purposes only and is meant to raise public awareness of current events and the potential dangers they could present.



WARNING SIGNS:
1.)
Two tons out of 6,000 tons of Ammonium Nitrate, (a material used in making powerful explosives) have gone missing from a shipment to a storage facility in the Vancouver area from a company that was recently bought out for $22 billion by some of the world’s largest financial companies. These companies are Goldman Sachs, AIG, The Carlye Group and others. The company that was purchased is called Kinder Morgan. Kinder Morgan didn’t report the two tons missing for over a month, when they did report it they came back a week later only to say they simply made a “clerical error”. Soon after the announcement, the RCMP started their investigation and came back saying they can’t confirm that it was really accounted for. Kinder Morgan has also tried to point out that they are only one company in the chain that had contact with the shipments. 250 truckloads were reportedly sent to Dyno Nobel (an explosives company) for packaging. There were also trucking companies hired to ship the product that the RCMP is attempting to track down. To put this into perspective, it is claimed that only one ton of this material was used during the Oklahoma City bombing, and now two tons are missing. That amount is more than enough material to cause substantial damage to numerous locations. With all of this said, the question arises, who has the capability and the motive to steal two tons of Ammonium Nitrate?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7k_OBjhfFs (Ammonium Nitrate not confirmed to be accounted for)
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/29kindercnd.html?_r=1&dlbk (Kinder Morgan bought out by financial giants)


2.)
The media is suddenly going wild about how Al-Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan are now using Ammonium Nitrate for explosives and the Afghani government has banned the use of the material. Afghanistan has also banned the use of Ammonium Nitrate for fertilizer due to this problem. There are many articles like these.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-01/24/c_13149134.htm (Al-Qaeda behind recent Ammonium Nitrate bombing)
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/articles/20100125.aspx (Afghanistan bans Ammonium Nitrate fertilizer)


3.)
Right on cue, as if it were a screenplay, and four days before the State of the Union address, the guy you have all heard of since 9/11, haven’t seen in a long time and who is probably dead, Mr. Usama Bin Laden ladies and gentlemen, give him a round of applause! He just came out in what is probably going to turn out to be yet another faked video and predictably praised the underwear bomber that burned his genitals in a failed bombing attempt on Christmas Day of 2009 and said the attacks will continue until we stop supporting Israel. In fact, look just how effective these guys are, they can get our freedoms taken away by our own governments, simply by penetrating our security and hurting only themselves in the process, clever aren’t they?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/world/25binladen.html (Bin Laden, just in time)


4.)
In a recent development Canadian parliament has been prorogued (A term where they are suspended typically in order to make new legislation and where all governmental power resides within the office of the Prime Minister.) until March 3rd (Remember that date.) after the games. The Prime Minister has also been given the sole responsibility for making the judgment call to shoot down any high jacked aircraft; normally this is not his responsibility.
This is strangely the same as before 9/11 where Dick Cheney was given control of the military air defenses for a short time due to war games being conducted, and he denied the request to shoot down the plane approaching the Pentagon. This was testified to by Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta in front of the 9/11 Commission, though no mention of this was given in the final report you can still watch the video of his testimony.
http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/Canadians+losers+move+prorogue+Parliament+Games/2419576/story.html (Parliament Prorogued)
http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_facts.html (Dick Cheney on 9/11 info)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y (Norman Mineta before the 911 Commission)
http://www.kelowna.com/2009/09/18/pm-in-charge-in-case-of-olympic-terror-norad-says/ (PM in charge)


5.)
On February 14th, 2008, Canada and the US signed an agreement which allows for the deployment of US troops inside Canada.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8323
And if the military wasn’t enough, police officers are allowed to come join in now.
Headline: New maritime security law will deputize U.S. officers “in every part of Canada” during integrated operations. (North American Union anyone?)
“On November 27, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson tabled legislation that would transform designated U.S. police and security agents into peace officers equal to the RCMP “in every part of Canada” during joint maritime border operations.”
The Olympics in of 2010 will be a “joint maritime border operation”.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16499


6.)
British Columbia’s privacy office has been frozen, leaving the government unaccountable, says a leaked letter.
“Operations at the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner have ceased, leaving British Columbians with no independent office to hold the government accountable, says a leaked letter marked “Extremely Urgent” to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. The letter, sent Friday, is from the executive director of the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Mary Carlson, and is addressed to Bill Barisoff. She said staff have shut down the whole operation to avoid any legal issues that could arise from reviewing cabinet files or law-enforcement information. Their duties also include opening appeal files and privacy complaints, securing and reviewing records on the subject of an appeal, authorizing time extensions to respond to access requests and policing the timeliness of government responses to access requests.”
http://www.canada.com/news/national/privacy%20office%20frozen%20leaked%20letter%20says/2475035/story.html


7.)
Hospitals cancelled 2,400 elective surgeries to make room for apparently, much expected patients needing surgeries during the Olympics. Of course, public relations is blaming them for doing it for other reasons like saving money. They say that even if that makes no sense, because the government had no problem spending well over a billion dollars on the Olympics, they are clearly not hurting for money, even if that is what some people think.
http://news.sympatico.cbc.ca/abc/Local/BC/ContentPosting?isfa=1&feedname=CBC_LOCALNEWS&date=true&newsitemid=vancouver-bc-oylmpics-cancelled-surgeries-dix


8.)
It seems that people may be getting tipped off or have prior knowledge already! What are they afraid of if the largest joint security operation ever taken on by Canada and the US is there to protect them? “Obama is not alone; presidents and prime minister of other countries around the globe are sending representatives as well.”
http://www.examiner.com/x-29795-Vancouver-Social-Policy-Examiner~y2010m1d24-US-President-Obama-likely-a-noshow-for-2010-Olympic-opening-ceremonies


9.)
The same Israeli company Verint, whose camera systems were on buses and the London underground and inconveniently (for us) malfunctioned on 7/7/05 during the London Bombings, was the same company to install cameras in Vancouver Airport, the subways in Montreal, and other key locations around Canada. Also, worthy of noting is that in the past, during a large terrorist attack where their systems are installed, as the DOW goes down, stocks at Verint have always shown to have gone up. They are said to be connected to the Madrid bombings on 3/11, as well as 9/11. In more interesting news about Verint’s systems,
“It appears that there is a backdoor in Verint’s system that can be accessed any time from any where. Still the U.S. continues turning the other cheek and allowing it to happen.”
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=164395 (Verint stock and other info)
http://verint.com/corporate/releases_view.cfm?article_level1_category_id=7&article_level1_id=245&pageno=1&year=2002 (Verint press release on Vancouver Airport contract)
http://www.billslinksandmore.com/Billsblog/2009/03/10/americas-israeli-spying-problems/ (Backdoor in Verint security systems)
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2005/130705buscamera.htm (Verint 7/7 bus camera malfunction)
http://verint.com/corporate/releases_view.cfm?article_level1_category_id=7&article_level1_id=360&pageno=1&year=2004 (Verint press release on London Underground contract)


10.)
Security measures have been increased to an historic all-time high with a budget of $900 million dollars, amid financial turmoil. Security includes the foreign United States military using NORAD to secure the air, purchases of 800 CCTV security cameras, new fences, two remote submarines to check for underwater threats and even bomb sniffing dogs. Canadian military with warships, black helicopters and fighter jets have been seen floating and flying around the Vancouver area already in January causing fear to many Canadians. There will also be tens of thousands of police and private security forces who are reported to be renting schools and trailers to use as bases for their operations.
Strangely enough, regardless of the build-up of security they have undertaken and the threat of attacks, they seem to double-think and claim to not be worried about it that much and are even allowing weaknesses in security to be exploited through the media. The contracted security companies have even been hiring people with zero background in security to help run security at the games, people who will not even have enough time to train properly to do their job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LM5NEtUOFy8 (American troops ready to cross the border in the case of attack)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_kkBHa6718&feature=related (Big Brother at the Olympics)
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/January2010/19/c9859.html (Unprecedented security)
http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Lethal+force+option+Olympic+Games+airspace+Norad/2461441/story.html (NORAD says lethal force is an option)
http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Lore+Rings+Trailers+house+Whistler+security+force/2430087/story.html (Law enforcement renting trailers)
http://www.whistlerquestion.com/article/20100120/WHISTLER01/301209787/1030/WHISTLER/whistler-secondary-games-rental-secured (Law enforcement renting elementary schools)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB54Lk00eTk
(Vancouver Airport Authority Not Serious About Olympic Security)
http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/2010wintergames/Strict+scrutiny+measures+airport+necessary+train+travellers/2453439/story.html (Strict airport security needed)
http://olympics.thestar.com/2010/article/755326--security-olympic-screening-assigned-to-novices (Security personnel will be novices)


11.)
The corporate/government-controlled media outlets are exaggerating the threat of radical Islamic terrorism and the UK has raised the threat level to “severe”. The media is also throwing around the term “Al-Qaeda” specifically, it almost seems as if they are trying to scare people. In addition, they’ve even said there is fear of a repeat of the 1996 Atlanta bomb blast.
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/Olympics2010/2009/07/27/security-Atlanta-blast/ (Afraid of a bomb)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv-VgPil7b4 (Terror threat level raised to severe)
http://www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=20070306_094145_4900 (Al-Qaeda attacks being prepared for by the military)


*My explanation of why the media is used to scare people:

The method for control that professional mind manipulators use is referred to as “Problem, Reaction, Solution” and works using basic mind manipulation techniques, like this; first they cause a traumatic event, a good example that relates to this is 9/11. This causes people lots of grief, pain and fear, and when a traumatic event occurs, the mind naturally attempts to figuratively construct what is sometimes called an “amnesia wall” around that event to block it out, this is a way our mind helps us to deal with fear by forgetting about it. But you can’t just forget about it, you have to have a reason that behavior is acceptable in light of the present danger.
Next, the programming is set in place of who is the enemy and who can stop them. The next phase is to cause the people to recall the traumatic event(9/11/01). By suggesting and warning about the possibility it could happen again, they help to reinforce peoples’ fears of having to experience another traumatic incident.
So by causing them to access the (traumatic) memory that their conscious mind is actively trying to block out, this actually causes them to access the programming they were given after that previous traumatic event happened. The programming was set in place for what should happen next in the case that the traumatic memory is ever brought up again. Subsequently, this causes them to chase after the “hero image” (The government in this case.) that was previously set up for them to trust in to save them from ever having to experience another traumatic incident. Thus the people are willing to relinquish their freedom for security.
By doing so they are exploiting natural processes in the mind and exploiting the “Problem, Reaction, Solution” formula for control. In short, it works by creating a problem, getting the victim to respond to the problem, and providing the victim with a predetermined solution to that problem that was created for them, to bring about a desired outcome for the controller.
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4535744/Neuro_Linguistic_Programming_WorkBook.pdf
(Educational book on Neuro Linguistic Programming)
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/01/03/illuminati-formula-used-create-undetectable-total-mind-controlled-slave-fritz-sprin
(Educational book on Trauma Based Mind Control)


12.)
Olympic protests are being rightly predicted to be held by people who are being labeled radicals, (Who in the public mind have begun being associated with “terrorists” and even labeled “domestic terrorists”.) some of the protesters may truly be radicals, and some have publicly stated that they will use violence to disrupt the Olympic games. Certainly though, not all of the protestors are violent extremists. That to me is suspicious as well, who would publicly call for acts of violence and destruction other than someone who is being protected? As if this isn’t enough, Vancouver Integrated Security Unit basically stated that they would not necessarily rule out using agent provocateurs in protests (another false-flag technique), that is very alarming for the peaceful protestors planning to attend.
http://www.straight.com/article-241166/isu-wont-rule-out-agents-provocateurs (Police won’t rule out using agent provocateurs)
http://www.nowpublic.com/sports/harry-bloy-liberal-mla-called-olympic-protesters-terrorists (Olympic protestors called terrorists)
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/10/13/bc-olympic-violent-resister.html (Anti-Olympic protestor supports violent direct action)


13.)
We also have some strange things happening that have proven in the past to be unusually accurate about predicting the future (Ex. Tom Clancy’s novel that predicted the incident between Russian and Georgia). Here, we find a recent novel written about the Olympics being attacked by terrorists in 2010 in Vancouver, setting the precedent that this is something possible and we should expect it and be afraid. This also is used, once again to cause us to recall a traumatic event such as 9/11 (by the Al Qaeda association) and associate it with the new potential traumatic event (Olympics attack) so the same programming about what to believe and how to act carries over.
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100117/bc_red_snow_100117/20100117/?hub=BritishColumbiaHome (Olympics attack novel: BC Red Snow)


14.)
Another strange thing someone noticed is that we have a Hollywood movie (2012) placed in the year 2012, (a movie about the destruction of the world and the elite leaving behind the masses in protective bunkers only to save themselves) mentioning British Columbia 2010. Why was that put in there? Before 9/11 we saw 9/11 in the movies, on TV shows, in books and in video games. Someone knew a long time ago what was being planned for the future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sePNNy8wjgE (2012 clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JHThf32azM (This is an 8 part series showing the Illuminati, New World Order, Freemasonry and 9/11 in entertainment before 9/11 happened, it is very fun to watch.)


15.)
I believe that there will still be hundreds of thousands of people in the area on March 3rd trying to get out using the underground rail, boats, planes and other various modes of transportation. This sets the stage as a prime target for a large death toll and mass hysteria. Locals that left on vacation will also be returning home around this time; the events officially end on Feb. 28, 2010.
Also, I want to point out something a bit strange. Notice the pattern of doubled odd numbers with each of the three previous false flag terrorism events; 3/11 in Madrid, 9/11 in New York, 7/7 in London, and possibly 3/3 in Vancouver. Could another false flag fall on March 3rd?


16.)
There was a foiled “terror plot” called the “Toronto 18” in which 18 people were arrested and detained. Their plan was reportedly to behead the Prime Minister and use Ammonium Nitrate bombs to blow up targets around Canada. The leader has been sentenced to prison for life and is serving that time, but another walked away free after being sentenced 7 years in prison because of his four years already spent in jail. Why did the judge let someone who states he wants people to die to leave jail? And what has happened to the other 16 people? Could they be agents and the “ringleader” a patsy? It’s not out of the question.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/terrorist-who-plotted-to-kill-canadian-pm-walks-away-free_100307152.html (Terrorism conspirator walks free)
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/toronto-18-mastermind-sentenced-life-prison-terror-plot/story?id=9595349 (Mastermind sentenced to life)


17.)
An electrical hydro vault in downtown Vancouver also exploded recently and injured three workers while they were doing “regular maintenance”. Electrical maintenance on a thing they claim isn’t even being used for anything? Now, I don’t know about you, but that’s at least a little bit suspicious to me. Why were they working on something that isn’t even used? I find it even more suspect because in the novel that I mentioned earlier, the author calls for cutting power to certain areas in order to facilitate the terrorist attacks. None of the injured workers have been named or interviewed by anyone at all and the cause of the explosion is still “under investigation” by WorkSafe BC. Could this relate to preparations for an attack? Was it a cover for illegal things happening nearby? Or was it just an accident?
http://www.kelowna.com/2009/12/24/three-hydro-workers-injured-in-incident-in-underground-vault-one-man-remains-in-hospital-with-serious-burns/ (Workers injured in downtown blast)


18.)
The Canadian government bought over $1 million worth of tickets, over 3,200 seats, and refuses to tell why, or who gets them, if anyone does. In some seemingly good news, some politicians are refusing to accept tickets as perks because they say it is “inappropriate”. More recently though,
“The federal and provincial governments are trying to say that the tickets are only being used to ‘advance government agendas’, as though that admission makes it sound any better.”
Now that doesn’t sound suspicious to you, does it?
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100120/bc_olympics_ticket_handouts_100120/20100120/?hub=BritishColumbiaHome ($1 million in tickets purchased)
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2010/01/26/adrian-macnair-politicians-elbow-their-way-to-front-of-olympic-line.aspx (Tickets being used to advance agenda)
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/public-spending-on-tickets-under-scrutiny/article1445472/ (Government spending money on tickets raises debate)


19.)
Originally, tickets were sold out in two days, prices varied but went as high as $750 per event. Soon after, those who purchased the tickets began to resell them online for higher prices, some as high as $5,000. Ticket sales at those prices have been steady for months until a couple of weeks ago. Suddenly tickets aren’t being purchased, and lots of people are selling their tickets! Tickets are now being sold at prices lower than they were originally. Usually, before an event, the price will go up, but apparently people don’t want to go now, why would that be?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/dave_zirin/01/25/vancouver/?xid=shareFB (As the Olympics near, people are dreading the games.)
Is it possible that after 9/11, spotting false-flag style terrorism is so much easier now that people have been educated and people have begun seen these things on their own? Is it that people don’t trust their own governments? It’s becoming very evident that people are losing trust in their governments, and they shouldn’t trust them either. There are scores of sites now popping up warning about this possible attack on the Olympics, and searching for more evidence that this could be a false-flag attack. A friend of mine in the Army at Ft. Bragg, NC said to me in recent months that he believes the US military is preparing for a false-flag attack. Now that was scary for me to hear, because he didn’t go into any more detail than that. Anything is possible, and these things are plausible. We don’t need to be afraid, we just need to get the word out, if we do, this may never happen. The reason it would happen is so it could be blamed on another entity, if they can’t do that anymore, they lose that method and have less power over us. Together by spreading the information about this, we can eliminate the threat of false flag terror take away that weapon from those who wish to exploit it and we can use this information as a weapon and turn it right back around on them. I would rather nothing happen, but if it does, we’re going to be here ready to answer why we thought it would happen, and ready to turn this event back against them. So please, join in the search for more information, check out the companies involved, check out the people involved, check their connections, check out previous false flag attacks, learn how they work and find out if anything you see this time reminds you of a previous event. Together, we can save the world, one person at a time, wake up to the world around you, and wake up those around you. Thank you.
Contact the author on Facebook:
I will be posting any relevant updates to a Facebook group page “The Anti New World Order Group”. Anyone with relevant information is welcome to bring it to peoples’ attention through the page.
Coming Soon:
Vancouver 2010: False Security – Real Terror Trailer By Ryan Pennington

====================================================================



Obama likely a no-show during opening ceremonies for 2010 Games
By Staff reporter, The ProvinceJanuary 25, 2010

U.S. President Barack Obama probalby won't attend the opening ceremonies, but the White House hasn't revealed if he will attend the 2010 Olympics.
Photograph by: Jim Young, Reuters
U.S. President Barack Obama may not attend the opening ceremonies of the 2010 Winter Games, but an announcement is expected soon on whether he will appear during the two weeks of events.
The Canadian Press is reporting that an announcement should be made next week to name the American delegation to the 2010 Olympics.
Vice-president Joe Biden is reported to be attending the opening ceremonies.
Although there are 80 nations with athletes competing at the Games, not all heads of state will attend. In some cases, the heads of sports ministries attend. And although heads of state may attend individual events, not all attend the opening cermeonies.
There is no official word on whether Prince Charles and his sons Prince William and Prince Harry will attend.

Clinton Warns China...Russia Prepares.



The following articles from today's international news sources further point to what in prophecy is the union, or axis of Iran, Russia and China.
Perhaps someone should have reminded Mrs. Clinton that not only does China not take threats or warnings from any country lightly, but it is also the U.S.'s biggest lender. The U.S. owes the Chinese somewhere around 2 trillion dollars, and is also the world's biggest holder of U.S. treasuries.
China has a 2 million strong standing army, that is being prepared for the eventual confrontation with the U.S. They, unlike the U.S. military, are completely intact, not stretched thin around the world, and have some of the world's most advanced weapons systems. Today, besides being warned by Clinton, there was also news that the U.S. would go ahead with an arms shipment to Taiwan, that will further enrage the Chinese.
On the other hand, you also have Russia, who today also made news by test flying their newest version of a 5th generation military plane that can go toe to toe with the F22 American Raptor (which by the way funding for the Raptor project was just pulled last year by the Obama adm.)
Clearly we are seeing posturing by countries both in the west and the east, and just as I have written about in my first book, "The Forty Letters of Preparation for the End of an Age," these two sides, east and west, will face off over and after Iran is attacked.
The stage is being set, are you prepared???


Clinton: China risks isolation over Iran

By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer Matthew Lee, Associated Press Writer – 2 hrs 51 mins ago

PARIS – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned China on Friday it risks diplomatic isolation and disruption to its energy supplies unless it helps keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons.s
Speaking in Paris, Clinton said she and others who support additional sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program are lobbying China to back new U.N. penalties on the Iranian government.
She said she understood China's reluctance to impose new penalties on Iran, its third-largest supplier of oil. But she stressed that a nuclear-armed Iran would destabilize the Persian Gulf and imperil oil shipments China gets from other Arab states in the region.
There is a new push for sanctions at the U.N. because of Iran's continued refusal to engage on the matter with the five permanent members of the Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — and Germany.
Administration officials have invited new talks with Iran, but with no sign that Iran wants to do business, the focus has turned to penalties.
"As we move away from the engagement track, which has not produced the result that some had hoped for, and move forward on the pressure and sanctions track, China will be under a lot of pressure to recognize the destabilizing impact that a nuclear-armed Iran would have in the Gulf, from which they receive a significant percentage of their oil supplies," Clinton said.
She spoke a day after the U.S. Senate approved new sanctions against Iran that would extend U.S. prohibitions on business dealings with Iran. The United States has no diplomatic relations with Iran and extremely limited commercial interaction, all as a result of the rupture in 1979 when militants took over the U.S. Embassy.
Clinton aid the legislative efforts do not conflict with her work to line up other countries for separate international sanctions against Iran.
"We will do what we can to direct their legislation in a way that supports our efforts internationally," Clinton said in Paris.
"We're going to work as hard as we can to get the strongest possible resolution," at the U.N., Clinton said.
The United States is the most visible leader in the new push for U.N. Security Council sanctions, and Clinton spent much of her time in Europe this week lobbying major powers whose support she needs to pass and enforce new economic penalties. Some of the additional measures that will be proposed target elements of Iran's powerful militia structure, U.S. officials said.
The Security Council has approved three previous sets of restrictions and penalties related to Iran's defiance of international demands for assurances about its nuclear program. The punishments have mostly been mild and directed at government and business entities tied to the nuclear program. In response, Iran has accelerated its work to enrich uranium.
"We certainly expect to come up with an even firmer fourth resolution," French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said following a meeting with Clinton on Friday.
The Obama administration has said Iran appears bent on developing nuclear weapons, although Iran claims its nuclear work is peaceful. Iran is thought to have stockpiled more than enough nuclear material to manufacture a single bomb, and more is being made daily.
The risks of an Iranian bomb are manifold, Clinton said.
"It will produce an arms race," in the Persian Gulf, and Israel will feel its very existence threatened, Clinton said in response to a question from an audience member during a speech at a French military academy. "All of that is incredibly dangerous."
The United States has cautioned Israel publicly against a pre-emptive strike on Iran's known nuclear facilities, arguing that such an attack would invite an arms race and retaliation.
China has traditionally resisted U.N. Security Council sanctions, saying they are counterproductive and harm efforts to persuade Iran to prove its claim that the nuclear program is peaceful.
Clinton met Thursday in London with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi to make the case to move ahead with sanctions at the United Nations. U.S. officials said Yang's response was noncommittal.
In Paris, Clinton said her message to the Chinese had been this: "We understand that right now it seems counterproductive to you to sanction a country from which you get so much of the natural resources your growing economy needs. But think about the longer-term implications."
The United States risked tension with China on a different matter, with formal word Friday that an arms sale to Taiwan will go ahead. The deal would provide more than $6 billion in weapons sales to the self-governing island the Chinese claim as their own.

Also see: Obama's arms sale to Taiwan likely to anger China



===================================================================

video link to today's Russian stealth plane maiden flight.

Russia's first stealth fighter makes maiden flight

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV,


Associated Press Writer Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press Writer

Fri Jan 29, 1:59 pm ET

MOSCOW – Russia's first stealth fighter intended to match the latest U.S. design made its maiden flight Friday, boosting the country's efforts to modernize its rusting Soviet-built arsenals and retain its lucrative export market.
The Sukhoi T-50's flight comes nearly two decades after the first prototype of the U.S. F-22 Raptor took to the air, and Russian officials said it will take another five years for the new jet to enter service. Still, the flight marked a major step in Russia's efforts to burnish the faded glory of its aviation industries and strengthen a beleaguered military.
The sleek twin-engined jet closely resembling the Raptor flew for 47-minutes from an airfield at Sukhoi's production plant in the Far Eastern city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur on Friday. Development of the so-called fifth-generation fighter has been veiled in secrecy and no images of it had been released before the flight.






Truth behind Today's GDP Numbers.



This morning it was reported that the U.S. economy grew at a 5.7 pct pace for the fourth quarter of 09, which was the fastest pace since 2003. It also marked two straight quarters of growth after consistent declines up to the third quarter of 09.
There was much cheering on all the TV stations about this more than expected figure and even Obama took credit for the increase in GDP, and made mention of how his economic policies were in fact working.
Well, I will say that Mr. Obama should take credit for this increase in GDP because the one thing all these Team Obama Cheerleaders (media) are forgetting to mention is the simple fact that it was all Big government intervention that helped increase this GDP figure!
Let us not forget as so many this morning did, that GDP in this country no longer represents true production of anything, but rather consumption, as in 75% of consumer spending!
The fact that the GDP growth rate ticked up in the 3rd and 4th quarter of 2009 is all due to the fact that programs such as "Cash for Clunkers" and the rebate of 8,000 for home buyers was in full swing. The truth of the matter is that these growth numbers are all due to government intervention.
So not only did the government's GDP figure artificially rise, but so did the government's huge debt! But as long as people get the sense that the economy is growing, maybe they will be lulled back into becoming happy, spending consumers once again.
Also, according to the Associated Press, 60 percent of the 4th quarters rise in GDP came as a result of companies that had laid off workers, were merely replenishing stockpiles.
But the real question is going to be what will happen when all the government stimulus cash plans, and artificial spending incentive programs end??
With the real unemployment rate hovering between 20-22% (when you take into account those that are either part time workers, those that have been out of work for more than 26 wks, and those that have just stopped looking all together), we will see if Mr. Obama takes full credit for the future GDP numbers.
Also 2010, just like back in 2008, will be a year for millions of mortgage rate resets, and many economists are predicting millions of foreclosures, much more than even in 2008.
But it seems that media would rather cheer lead than provide the ugly truth.
Just the other day it was also reported that the Senate had just approved a 1.9 trillion spending bill, so not only is there more possible future cash for clunkers programs, but more artificial GDP figures to come in the near future, as well as possible bailouts of about 32 states that are about to go bankrupt.
But there is only one problem with all of this...Who's going to bail out the U.S.??? China???
Already countries throughout the world have stopped purchasing Treasuries which is what the U.S. sells in auction markets to fund some of their huge debt. But over the past 2 years, we have seen that some of the U.S.'s largest debt purchasers (China, India, Middle East nations) have decided to go an alternate route by not purchasing any more of these Treasuries.
In 2009, there were several Treasury debt auctions, and the biggest purchaser of these T-Bills was the U.S. Federal Reserve. In other words, the hungry snake has started to eat it's own tail to satisfy it's own hunger, which ancient cultures used as a symbol for insanity!!!
The writing is on the wall, but few in Washington see it. Some see it but ignore it, and some see it but can't do anything about it.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

North vs. South Tensions Rise.


N.Korea fires 80 shells despite warning shots: Seoul
by Staff WritersSeoul (AFP) Jan 28, 2010




North Korea fired more than 80 shells into the sea near its disputed maritime border with South Korea on Wednesday, officials said, sparking an artillery exchange which fuelled tensions on the peninsula.
The communist state's land batteries lobbed about 30 shells in the morning and more than 50 in the afternoon, according to Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Ignoring a strong protest from the South, the North said it had every right to carry out an annual live fire drill and would continue the exercise. A day earlier it had declared two "no sail" zones in the area.
The morning barrage lasted more than one hour, Seoul officials said, and South Korean Marines stationed on a nearby island responded with about 100 warning cannon shots. There were no casualties.
The South did not respond to the afternoon's salvo, which again landed on the North Korean side of the contested sea border.
Analysts said the drill was partly aimed at highlighting Pyongyang's demand for talks with the United States on a formal peace treaty to end the 1950-53 war before it returns to nuclear disarmament talks.
They said an escalation was unlikely but not impossible on the border, the scene of deadly naval battles in 1999 and 2002. In the latest clash, last November, a firefight left a North Korean patrol boat in flames.
A Joint Chiefs spokesman said they had information the drill would continue through Friday.
Seoul's defence ministry vowed in a message to the North to "strongly react" to any provocative acts.
"The North committed a gravely provocative act by declaring no-sail zones in the Yellow Sea in breach of the (Korean War) armistice and the inter-Korean non-aggression pact," it said in a statement.
"We expressed grave concerns over the North's threatening behaviour and demanded an immediate halt to all such activities," it said.
"The military will strongly react to any provocative acts by the North and all the responsibility for consequences will rest with the Northern side."
The borderline was drawn up by United Nations forces after the war. The North refuses to accept it and says it should run further to the south.
The two nations have remained technically at war since their conflict ended only in an armistice.
The North, hit by sanctions for its nuclear and missile programmes, has sent mixed messages in recent weeks.
It is pressing to upgrade or restart joint business projects with the South, while the military has threatened its neighbour with war.
Media reports that the South has drawn up a contingency plan for regime collapse in Pyongyang angered the North, as did Seoul's warning that it would launch a preemptive strike to foil any threatened nuclear attack.
"By increasing tension on the peninsula, North Korea is making a gesture to the United States that peace talks are important," said Kim Yong-Hyun, of Seoul's Dongguk University, adding it was also responding to Seoul's recent comments.
Armed clashes are unlikely but not out of the question, Kim told AFP.
"The regime is expressing anger towards South Korea," said Cheong Seong-Chang, of the Sejong Institute think-tank.
"At the same time, heightened tension in a disputed area will help North Korea highlight its demand for a peace treaty," Cheong said.
Baek Seung-Joo, of the Korea Institute for Defence Analyses, said the North was "unlikely to take things to the extreme, as in general it wants to maintain economic cooperation with South Korea".
Unification Minister Hyun In-Taek, in charge of cross-border relations, said South Korea would push ahead with economic talks with the North due on Monday.
But the artillery barrage, he said, "reflects a very disappointing attitude" on the North's part. "Unnecessary acts raising tension must be stopped immediately."
Washington called North Korea's shelling "provocative" and urged restraint.
"The declaration by North Korea of a no sail zone and the live firing of artillery are provocative actions and as such as not helpful," State Department spokesman Philip Crowley told reporters.
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said: "We clearly are discouraging any further acts of aggression which would in any way increase the tensions along this historically disputed boundary area."

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Something Mysterious in Haiti pt IV.

It seems that as time passes and people throughout begin to see and understand the bigger picture, they all have the same question...What is really going on in Haiti??? The following article from today, refers to a lot of the same questions I originally brought up roughly a week ago.

Keep in mind, Bush and Clinton are Skull and Bones members and Obama is a CFR member. All top society ruling elites.

What’s Really Going On In Haiti?
Chuck Baldwin

Infowars.com

January 26, 2010

People of goodwill everywhere are rightly sympathetic to the plight of hundreds of thousands of innocent Haitians in the aftermath of the terrible earthquake that rocked the island country. Private donations and volunteer efforts are pouring into Haiti from all over the globe–especially from the United States. This is a good thing, right? So, why am I troubled?
There are many things that do not add up regarding what is going on in Haiti.
Simply put, I cannot remember such an all-out “relief effort” by our nation’s military and government forces following a natural disaster anywhere–ever! Not even New Orleans, Louisiana, and surrounding Gulf Coast communities here in the homeland received the kind of attention from Washington, D.C., that Haiti is receiving.
According to Agence France-Press (AFP), “The US military is ramping up its mission in quake-hit Haiti, with 20,000 US troops expected to operate on ground and offshore by Sunday [January 24], the US commander overseeing the region said.”
No doubt, this would include ships and personnel from the USS Carl Vinson carrier group. Cost to US taxpayers to send an entire carrier group–along with more than 20,000 (so far) military personnel–to Haiti already numbers in the multiplied millions of dollars. It is also almost certain that there will be no quick exit from the island nation. There never is. In other words, our military presence (dare I say occupation?) in Haiti will doubtless last for years. At least, that’s the way Latin American and European countries see it. And they are probably right.
Suffice it to say that the United States military is now completely in charge in Haiti.
At this point, it would be very enlightening for everyone to read Walter Williams’ column dated January 20, 2010, entitled “Haiti’s Avoidable Death Toll.”
See Walter’s column at:
http://tinyurl.com/haiti-avoidable-death
In short, Williams notes that the high death toll in Haiti is directly related to the inferior political/economic philosophies of the Haitian government. There is no economic liberty, which has relegated it to being one of the world’s poorest nations, with no opportunity to build the kind of homes and businesses that can withstand natural disasters. Williams is right when he says, “President Barack Obama called the quake ‘especially cruel and incomprehensible.’ He would be closer to the truth if he had said that the Haitian political and economic climate that make Haitians helpless in the face of natural disasters are ‘especially cruel and incomprehensible.’”
Williams also observes, “Corruption is rampant” in Haiti. Crime is, likewise, ubiquitous in Haiti, with little real law enforcement. Private property rights are nonexistent. Like many (if not most) third world countries, people live in tyranny and bondage to insensitive, power-mad strongmen who use up the country’s resources for their own selfish purposes. Tyranny always impoverishes people; freedom enriches them.
Williams rightly concludes, “Haiti’s disaster demands immediate Western assistance but it’s only the Haitian people who can relieve themselves of the deeper tragedy of self-inflicted poverty.” Amen.
All of that said, however, there are still several things bugging me about the Haiti story.
For one thing, why was an earthquake of this magnitude not felt beyond Port-au-Prince? (The only reports saying tremors were felt out of Haiti belong to US-controlled sources.) All of the testimonies that I have read from people living in the adjoining country of the Dominican Republic (which shares the same island with Haiti) that were quoted by French, British, or Spanish outlets universally say they felt nothing. If the foreign press is reporting the story accurately, the devastation was almost exclusively contained in and around Port-au-Prince. That is very strange to me. Even most of the roads reportedly remained open after the quake.
Another oddity is the fact that this earthquake did not produce a tsunami. It is being called “miraculous” that an earthquake measuring 7.0 on the Richter Scale did not produce a colossal tsunami, which would have affected everyone in the region.
Furthermore, does the French government know something that we don’t–but should? According to a report of the Global Analysis International Intelligence (GAII), “Not coincidentally, Agence France-Press (AFP), which of course is closely affiliated with French intelligence, filed a report on 14th January which contained the following concluding sentence:
“‘On Wednesday, Obama ordered a “swift, coordinated and aggressive effort to save lives” in Haiti following the murderous quake, as a massive US aid mission swung into action, using troops, naval forces, aircraft and rescue teams.’

“FACT: An ‘act of God,’ or natural calamity, is NOT a ‘murderous quake.’
“The use of the word MURDEROUS here implies that someone is doing the MURDERING.”
GAII further speculates that the earthquake may have been the work of US Black Ops, which “flattened the French embassy and many of its officials, imploded the United Nations’ own establishments in the Haitian capital, and no doubt obliterated evidence of US Government and rogue official drug-running complicity . . . channeled through the Haitian capital for many years.”
See the intelligence report at:
http://tinyurl.com/gaii-haiti
Intelligence reports are also circulating about the possible disruption of liens and seizures of trillions of dollars by the international community relative to past crimes committed by former Presidents George Bush I and II, and Bill Clinton, which were being channeled through Haiti’s Central Bank.
If any of this is even remotely true, it is certainly more than convenient that the Haitian capital was destroyed.
This particular part of the story is a real sore spot with me. And I know if I broach this topic, many readers (especially my Christian brethren who live under the delusion that the Bush family can do no wrong) will refuse to believe anything I report and will even take their anger and umbrage out on me. So be it.
I am personally convinced that certain members of the Bush and Clinton families have been involved in the international smuggling of illicit drugs for decades. I have spoken in confidence with those who were in positions to know, and they have emphatically told me that both then-Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and then-President George H.W. Bush were complicit in CIA-assisted drug running out of Mena, Arkansas. (You don’t think I would say this if I did not have absolute confidence in the integrity and credibility of these sources, do you? Plus, why would they tell me this at potential great harm to themselves, if it were not true? And, no, I cannot divulge their names, for obvious reasons.) And there is absolutely no reason to believe that similar operations are not ongoing. In my opinion, it would be utterly naïve to think otherwise.
After all, it has been often reported that the CIA used Army Special Forces troops to facilitate the smuggling of drugs out of Indochina during the Vietnam War, has it not? Yes, it has. That rogue elements within the US government would use war–or even earthquakes–as cover and facilitation for illegal drug smuggling or money laundering would not surprise me one bit.
I realize it is extremely difficult for many Americans to contemplate that members of their own federal government could be evil enough to be involved in anything such as is implied above. According to the thinking of many Americans, evil people only live in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, or North Korea. And, of course, that is exactly what government propagandists want us to believe.
The truth is, no country or people has a monopoly on sin. As the prophet Jeremiah was inspired to say, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9) The Apostle Paul agreed. He told the Philippians, “We . . . have no confidence in the flesh.” (Philippians 3:3)
Thomas Jefferson said virtually the same thing when he said, “In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
This is why Jefferson and the rest of America’s founders insisted that we should be diligent to hold our civil magistrates accountable to the limits and protections of the US Constitution. They well understood the sentiments so wisely expressed by Lord Acton, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Christians, of all people, should understand this.
So, why are so many of us so quick to believe everything our government and their toadies in the national media are telling us? Are we so naïve as to believe that unregenerate politicians in Washington, D.C., are incapable of the same evil acts of barbarity and savagery that might be found in other parts of the world? Are sinners less sinful because they happened to receive their fallen nature from American bloodlines?
Am I saying that Black Ops personnel manufactured the earthquake in Haiti–and killed tens of thousands of people in the process–for the purpose of hiding or facilitating illegal activity? No, I am not. How in the world would I know it, even if it were true?
What I am saying is that, once again, for me, there are many things that do not add up regarding what is going on in Haiti. The way the earthquake behaved; the lack of related seismic and tsunamic activity usually associated with earthquakes of this magnitude; the unprecedented involvement of US military forces being used for “relief efforts” even as commanders are desperate to fill combat theaters in Iraq and Afghanistan; the occupation of another independent nation, which occurred at lightning speed; the vast sums of US taxpayer dollars being expended; the devastation done to key Haitian governmental and banking institutions–which were known to be conduits for international financial disbursements–with virtually no devastation experienced anywhere else; and intelligence reports of surreptitious activity circulating all over Europe and Latin America all add up to one big question, What’s really going on in Haiti?

Featured Post

TRUMP'S VICTORY SEALED FROM HIS MOTHER'S WOMB!

UPDATE...8/29/23   MY NEW LINK FOR SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE OF THIS SITE AND MY WORK. Greetings my brothers and sisters in Christ! Well, this...