3RD UPDATE...ORWELL'S 1984 AND TODAY'S WORLD!

3RD UPDATE...BELOW

GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984
AND TODAY'S REALITY!

OVER THE PAST FEW DAYS I PICKED UP A BOOK THAT I REMEMBER READING BACK IN HIGH SCHOOL. BEING THAT IT HAD BEEN SEVERAL YEARS SINCE I READ IT, I DECIDED TO GO BACK OVER IT AGAIN WITH MY NEW FILTERS FOR SEEING ILLUMINTI/MASONIC/NWO THEMES IN EVERYTHING I COME ACROSS AND IT WAS AMAZING HOW THIS BOOK THAT IS READ IN MANY HIGH SCHOOL CLASSES, AND HAS BEEN READ FOR DECADES, HAD SO MANY ILLUMINATI/NWO MESSAGES THAT GO ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT I HAVE COVERED ON THIS BLOG FOR THE PAST 7 YEARS.
WHEN COMPARED TO THE BOOK, THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION, AND MANY MASONIC TEXTS, THE GOALS AND THEMES OF THIS BOOK, GO RIGHT ALONG WITH THESE OTHER WRITTEN WORKS AS WELL.
ALL OF THESE WRITINGS, AS WELL AS ALL ENTERTAINMENT AND OTHER SOCIAL AND CULTURAL MEANS THEY USE TO PLANT THESE SEEDS, ARE ALL AWAYS SOLD TO THE IGNORANT MASSES AS FICTION BASED ENTERTAINMENT. YET IT'S NOT UNTIL YEARS LATER THAT ONE LOOKS OVER THESE WRITINGS AND ONE CAN CLEARLY SEE WHAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN HAPPENING IS EXACTLY WHAT WAS WRITTEN IN SO MANY OF THESE MASONIC/ILLUMINATI BASED SOURCES.
THE FOLLOWING IS THE LINK WHERE YOU CAN READ THE BOOK ONLINE. THERE WAS TOO MUCH INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN HERE, BUT I JUST POSTED THE MORE RELEVANT ITEMS, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO THE 'ATOMIC WARS' THAT IT DESCRIBES AS HAPPENING IN THE BOOK, AND HOW IT COMPARES TO WHERE THESE 3 SUPERSTATES, JUST AS THE BOOK DESCRIBES, ARE GEOPOLITICALLY SPEAKING NOW ON THE VERGE OF SUCH WAR.

https://www.planetebook.com/ebooks/1984.pdf
...page 217

‘And the conspiracy—the organization? Is it real? It is not simply an invention of the Thought Police?’ ‘No, it is real. The Brotherhood, we call it. You will never learn much more about the Brotherhood than that it exists and that you belong to it. I will come back to that presently.’ He looked at his wrist-watch. ‘It is unwise even for members of the Inner Party to turn off the telescreen for more than half an hour. You ought not to have come here together, and you will have to leave separately. You, comrade’—he bowed his head to Julia—’will leave first.
[NOTICE ABOVE IN THIS CONVERSATION BETWEEN THESE TWO CHARACTERS, WINSTON AND O'BRIEN, HOW THEY ARE USING THE TERMS, 'THE CONSPIRACY, THE ORGANIZATION, THE BROTHERHOOD!' ALL TERMS USED BY MASONIC/ILLUMINATI/ZIONIST.]

We have about twenty minutes at our disposal. You will understand that I must start by asking you certain questions. In general terms, what are you prepared to do?’ ‘Anything that we are capable of,’ said Winston. O’Brien had turned himself a little in his chair so that he was facing Winston. He almost ignored Julia, seeming to take it for granted that Winston could speak for her. For a moment the lids flitted down over his eyes. He began asking his questions in a low, expressionless voice, as though this were a routine, a sort of catechism, most of whose answers were known to him already. ‘You are prepared to give your lives?’
‘Yes.’ ‘You are prepared to commit murder?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘To commit acts of sabotage which may cause the death of hundreds of innocent people?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘To betray your country to foreign powers?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘You are prepared to cheat, to forge, to blackmail, to corrupt the minds of children, to distribute habit-forming drugs, to encourage prostitution, to disseminate venereal diseases—to do anything which is likely to cause demoralization and weaken the power of the Party?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘If, for example, it would somehow serve our interests to throw sulphuric acid in a child’s face—are you prepared to do that?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘You are prepared to lose your identity and live out the rest of your life as a waiter or a dock-worker?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘You are prepared to commit suicide, if and when we order you to do so?’ ‘Yes.’
[NOTICE ABOVE THE THINGS THEY ARE ALL PREPARED TO DO FOR THE 'BROTHERHOOD CAUSE,' JUST AS HAS BEEN DESCRIBED BY THE ZIONIST PROTOCOLS AND TOP LEVEL MASONS THROUGHOUT HISTORY.]

....page 220
‘You understand,’ he said, ‘that you will be fighting in the dark. You will always be in the dark. You will receive orders and you will obey them, without knowing why.
[NOTE ABOVE, HOW THEY WILL 'KEEP HIM IN THE DARK,' JUST AS MASONIC LITERATURE AND THE PROTOCOLS TEXT ALSO CLAIMS THEY KEEP OTHER MEMBERS IN UNTIL HIGHER DEGREES OF INITIATION ARE REACHED.]

Later I shall send you a book from which you will learn the true nature of the society we live in, and the strategy by which we shall destroy it. When you have read the book, you will be full members of the Brotherhood. But between the general aims that we are fighting for and the immedi ate tasks of the moment, you will never know anything. I tell you that the Brotherhood exists, but I cannot tell you whether it numbers a hundred members, or ten million. From your personal knowledge you will never be able to say that it numbers even as many as a dozen. You will have three or four contacts, who will be renewed from time to time as they disappear. As this was your first contact, it will be
preserved. When you receive orders, they will come from me. If we find it necessary to communicate with you, it will be through Martin. When you are finally caught, you will confess. That is unavoidable. But you will have very little to confess, other than your own actions. You will not be able to betray more than a handful of unimportant people. Probably you will not even betray me. By that time I may be dead, or I shall have become a different person, with a different face.’

...221
He continued to move to and fro over the soft carpet. In spite of the bulkiness of his body there was a remarkable grace in his movements. It came out even in the gesture with which he thrust a hand into his pocket, or manipulated a cigarette. More even than of strength, he gave an impression of confidence and of an understanding tinged by irony. However much in earnest he might be, he had nothing of the single-mindedness that belongs to a fanatic. When he spoke of murder, suicide, venereal disease, amputated limbs, and altered faces, it was with a faint air of persiflage. ‘This is unavoidable,’ his voice seemed to say; ‘this is what we have got to do, unflinchingly. But this is not what we shall be doing when life is worth living again.’ A wave of admiration, almost of worship, flowed out from Winston towards O’Brien. For the moment he had forgotten the shadowy figure of Goldstein.
...223
‘You will have heard rumours of the existence of the Brotherhood. No doubt you have formed your own picture of it. You have imagined, probably, a huge underworld of conspirators, meeting secretly in cellars, scribbling messages on walls, recognizing one another by codewords or by special movements of the hand. Nothing of the kind exists. The members of the Brotherhood have no way of recognizing one another, and it is impossible for any one member to be aware of the identity of more than a few others. Goldstein himself, if he fell into the hands of the Thought Police, could not give them a complete list of members, or any information that would lead them to a complete list. No such list exists. The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organization in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible. You will never have anything to sustain you, except the idea. You will get no comradeship and no encouragement. When finally you are caught, you will get no help. We never help our members. At most, when it is absolutely necessary that someone should be silenced, we are occasionally able to smuggle a razor blade into a prisoner’s cell. You will have to get used to living without results and without hope. You will work for a while, you will be caught, you will confess, and then you will die. Those are the only results that you will ever see. There is no possibility that any perceptible change will happen within our own lifetime. We are the dead. Our only true life is in the future. We shall take part

[NOTE WHAT I UNDERLINED ABOVE REGARDING HOW THEY WILL NEVER SEE THE END PRODUCT OF THE NWO GOALS. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT MANLY P. HALL, ANOTHER MASONIC/ILLUMINATI WRITER ALSO WROTE IN MANY OF HIS BOOKS AND WRITINGS. THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION ALSO STATE THE SIMILAR THEMES ABOUT HOW THEIR GOALS HAVE BEEN CENTURIES IN THE MAKING TOWARDS THEIR NWO GOALS.]

in it as handfuls of dust and splinters of bone. But how far away that future may be, there is no knowing. It might be a thousand years. At present nothing is possible except to extend the area of sanity little by little. We cannot act collectively. We can only spread our knowledge outwards from individual to individual, generation after generation. In the face of the Thought Police there is no other way.’
On the sixth day of Hate Week, after the processions, the speeches, the shouting, the singing, the banners, the posters, the films, the waxworks, the rolling of drums and squealing of trumpets, the tramp of marching feet, the grinding of the caterpillars of tanks, the roar of massed planes, the booming of guns—after six days of this, when the great orgasm was quivering to its climax and the general hatred of Eurasia had boiled up into such delirium that if the crowd could have got their hands on the 2,000 Eurasian war-criminals who were to be publicly hanged on the last day of the proceedings, they would unquestionably have torn them to pieces—at just this moment it had been announced that Oceania was not after all at war with Eurasia. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Eurasia was an ally.
[NOTE THE ABOVE...OCEANIA...THE U.S./UK/ WAS AT WAR WITH EASTASIA...CHINA AND COMPANY, AND EURASIA...NATO, WAS AN ALLY.]

page 237..

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF  OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM 
by  Emmanuel Goldstein
Winston began reading:
Chapter I 

Ignorance is Strength
Throughout recorded time, and probably since the end of the Neolithic Age, there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle, and the Low. They have been subdivided in many ways, they have borne countless different names, and their relative numbers, as well as their attitude towards one another, have varied from age to age: but the essential structure of society has never altered. Even after enormous upheavals and seemingly irrevocable changes, the same pattern has always reasserted itself, just as a gyroscope will always return to equilibrium, however far it is pushed one way or the other. The aims of these groups are entirely irreconcilable... Winston stopped reading, chiefly in order to appreciate the fact that he was reading, in comfort and safety. He was alone: no telescreen, no ear at the keyhole, no nervous impulse to glance over his shoulder or cover
[NOTICE HOW EVERYTHING IS USED TO SPY ON THE MASSES, AND TODAY'S MASSIVE TECHNOLOGY WAVE OF SPYWARE THAT IS USED AGAINST THE MASSES AS WELL.]

the page with his hand. The sweet summer air played against his cheek. From somewhere far away there floated the faint shouts of children: in the room itself there was no sound except the insect voice of the clock. He settled deeper into the arm-chair and put his feet up on the fender. It was bliss, it was etemity. Suddenly, as one sometimes does with a book of which one knows that one will ultimately read and re-read every word, he opened it at a different place and found himself at Chapter III. He went on reading:
Chapter III 

War is Peace
The splitting up of the world into three great super-states was an event which could be and indeed was foreseen before the middle of the twentieth century. With the absorption of Europe by Russia and of the British Empire by the United States, two of the three existing powers, Eurasia and Oceania, were already effectively in being. The third, Eastasia, only emerged as a distinct unit after another decade of confused fighting. The frontiers between the three super-states are in some places arbitrary, and in others they fluctuate according to the fortunes of war, but in general they follow geographical lines. Eurasia comprises the whole of the northern part of the European and Asiatic land-mass, from Portugal to the Bering Strait. Oceania comprises the Americas, the Atlantic islands including the British Isles, Australasia, and the southern portion of Africa. Eastasia, smaller than the others and with a less definite western frontier, comprises China and the countries to the south of it, the Japanese islands and a large but fluctuating portion of Manchuria, Mongolia, and Tibet. In one combination or another, these three super-states are permanently at war, and have been so for the past twenty-five years. War, however, is no longer the desperate, annihilating struggle that it was in the early decades of the twentieth century. It is a warfare of limited aims between combatants who are unable to destroy one another, have no material cause for fighting and are not divided by any genuine ideological difference This is not to say that either the conduct of war, or the prevailing attitude towards it, has become less bloodthirsty or more chivalrous. On the contrary, war hysteria is continuous and universal in all countries, and such acts as raping, looting, the slaughter of children, the reduction of whole populations to slavery, and reprisals against prisoners which extend even to boiling and burying alive, are looked upon as normal, and, when they are committed by one’s own side and not by the enemy, meritorious.

[NOTE WHAT IT SAYS BELOW, REGARDING VERY SMALL NUMBERS OF 'MOSTLY, HIGHLY TRAINED SPECIALSISTS, AND THE REBEL MOVEMENTS IN SYRIA, UKRAINE, AND COUNTLESS OTHER PLACES IN THE WORLD WHERE THE ILLUMINATI/MASONIC INTERESTS ARE MOSTLY FOCUSED ON.]

But in a physical sense war involves very small numbers of people, mostly highly-trained specialists, and causes comparatively few casualties. The fighting, when there is any, takes place on the vague frontiers whose whereabouts the average man can only guess at, or round the Floating Fortresses which guard strategic spots on the sea lanes. In the centres of civilization war means no more than a continuous shortage of consumption goods, and the occasional crash of a rocket bomb which may cause a few scores of deaths.
War has in fact changed its character. More exactly, the reasons for which war is waged have changed in their order of importance. Motives which were already present to some small extent in the great wars of the early twentieth centuury have now become dominant and are consciously recognized and acted upon. To understand the nature of the present war—for in spite of the regrouping which occurs every few years, it is always the same war—one must realize in the first place that it is impossible for it to be decisive. None of the three super-states could be definitively conquered even by the other two in combination. They are too evenly matched, and their natural defences are too formidable. Eurasia is protected by its vast land spaces, Oceania by the width of the Atlantic and the Pacific, Eastasia by the fecundity and indus triousness of its inhabitants. Secondly, there is no longer, in a material sense, anything to fight about. With the establishment of self-contained economies, in which production and consumption are geared to one another, the scramble for markets which was a main cause of previous wars has come to an end, while the competition for raw materials is no longer a matter of life and death. In any case each of the three super-states is so vast that it can obtain almost all the materials that it needs within its own boundaries. In so far as the war has a direct economic purpose, it is a war for labour power. Between the frontiers of the super-states, and not permanently in the possession of any of them, there lies a rough quadrilateral with its corners at Tangier, Brazzaville, Darwin, and Hong Kong, containing within it about a fifth of the population of the earth. It is for the possession of these thickly-populated regions, and of the northern
ice-cap, that the three powers are constantly struggling. In practice no one power ever controls the whole of the disputed area. Portions of it are constantly changing hands, and it is the chance of seizing this or that fragment by a sudden stroke of treachery that dictates the endless changes of alignment.

...238

The primary aim of modern warfare (in accordance with the principles of DOUBLETHINK, this aim is simultaneously recognized and not recognized by the directing brains of the Inner Party) is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living.
[DOUBLETHINK OF COURSE IS THE RECREATION AND REASSIGNMENT OF TERMS AND CONCEPTS IN ORDER TO SELL WHAT IS EVIL AND IMMORAL TO THE MASSES IN TERMS THAT MAKES IT ACCEPTABLE AND PALATABLE. ABORTION BECOMES 'PRO CHOICE.' SUICIDE BECOMES EUTHANASIA. GAY MARRIAGE BECOMES 'PROGRESSIVE UNIONS OF MARRIAGES.' ETC.]

Ever since the end of the nineteenth century, the problem of what to do with the surplus of consumption goods has been latent in industrial society. At present, when few human beings even have enough to eat, this problem is obviously not urgent, and it might not have become so, even if no artificial processes of destruction had been at work. The world of today is a bare, hungry, dilapidated place compared with the world that existed before 1914, and still more so if compared with the imaginary future to which the people of that period looked forward. In the early twentieth century, the vision of a future society unbelievably rich, leisured, orderly, and efficient—a glittering antiseptic world of glass and steel and snow-white concrete—was part of the consciousness of nearly every literate person. Science and technology were developing at a prodigious speed, and it seemed natural to assume that they would go on developing. This failed to happen, partly because of the impoverishment caused by a long series of wars and revolutions, partly because scientific and technical progress depended on the empirical habit of thought, which could not survive in a strictly regimented society. As a whole the world is more primitive today than it was fifty years ago. Certain backward areas have advanced, and various devices, always in some way connected with warfare and police espionage, have been developed, but experiment and invention have largely stopped, and the ravages of the atomic war of the nineteen-fifties have never been fully repaired. Nevertheless the dangers inherent in the machine are still there. From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations. And in fact, without being used for any such purpose, but by a sort of automatic process— by producing wealth which it was sometimes impossible not to distribute—the machine did raise the living standards of the average humand being very greatly over a period of about fifty years at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries.

But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction—indeed, in some sense was the destruction—of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which WEALTH, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while POWER remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance. To return to the agricultural past, as some thinkers about the beginning of the twentieth century dreamed of doing, was not a practicable solution. It conflicted with the tendency towards mechanization which had become quasi-instinctive throughout almost the whole world, and moreover, any country which remained industrially backward was helpless in a military sense and was bound to be dominated, directly or indirectly, by its more advanced rivals.

Nor was it a satisfactory solution to keep the masses in poverty by restricting the output of goods. This happened to a great extent during the final phase of capitalism, roughly between 1920 and 1940. The economy of many countries was allowed to stagnate, land went out of cultivation, capital equipment was not added to, great blocks of the population were prevented from working and kept half alive by State charity. But this, too, entailed military weakness, and since the privations it inflicted were obviously unnecessary, it made opposition inevitable. The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare. The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed. A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built. In principle the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three servants, his private motor-car or helicopter—set him in a different world from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call ‘the proles’. The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival. War, it will be seen, accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way. In principle it would be quite simple to waste the surplus labour of the world by building temples and pyramids, by digging holes and filling them up again, or even by producing vast quantities of goods and then setting fire to them.

page 243..

But this would provide only the economic and not the emotional basis for a hierarchical society. What is concerned here is not the morale of masses, whose attitude is unimportant so long as they are kept steadily at work, but the morale of the Party itself. Even the humblest Party member is expected to be competent, industrious, and even intelligent within narrow limits, but it is also necessary that he should be a credulous and ignorant fanatic whose prevailing moods are fear, hatred, adulation, and orgiastic triumph. In other words it is necessary that he should have the mentality appropriate to a state of war. It does not matter whether the war is actually happening, and, since no decisive victory is possible, it does not matter whether the war is going well or badly. All that is needed is that a state of war should exist....
[WHAT SOCIETY DOES THIS SOUND LIKE FOR THE PAST CENTURY???]

Meanwhile no Inner Party member wavers for an instant in his mystical belief that the war is real, and that it is bound to end victoriously, with Oceania [THE UNITED STATES] the undisputed master of the entire world.

All members of the Inner Party believe in this coming conquest as an article of faith. It is to be achieved either by gradually acquiring more and more territory and so building up an overwhelming preponderance of power, or by the discovery of some new and unanswerable weapon. The search for new weapons continues unceasingly, and is one of the very few remaining activities in which the inventive or speculative type of mind can find any outlet....

page 244...
All members of the Inner Party believe in this coming conquest as an article of faith. It is to be achieved either by gradually acquiring more and more territory and so building up an overwhelming preponderance of power, or by the discovery of some new and unanswerable weapon. The search for new weapons continues unceasingly, and is one of the very few remaining activities in which the inventive or speculative type of mind can find any outlet. In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist. In Newspeak there is no word for ‘Science’. The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And even technological progress only happens when its products can in some way be used for the diminution of human liberty. In all the useful arts the world is either standing still or going backwards. The fields are cultivated with horse-ploughs while books are written by machinery. But in matters of vital importance—meaning, in effect, war and police espionage—the empirical approach is still encouraged, or at least tolerated. The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought. There are therefore two great problems which the Party is concerned to solve. One is how to discover, against his will, what another human being is thinking, and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand. In so far as scientific research still continues, this is its subject matter. The scientist of today is either a mixture of psychologist and inquisitor, studying with real ordinary minuteness the meaning of facial expressions, gestures, and tones of voice, and testing the truth-producing effects of drugs, shock therapy, hypnosis, and physical torture; or he is chemist, physicist, or biologist concerned only with such branches of his special subject as are relevant to the taking of life. In the vast laboratories of the Ministry of Peace, and in the experimental stations hidden in the Brazilian forests, or in the Australian desert, or on lost islands of the Antarctic, the teams of experts are indefatigably at work.

Some are concerned simply with planning the logistics of future wars; others devise larger and larger rocket bombs, more and more powerful explosives, and more and more impenetrable armour-plating; others search for new and deadlier gases, or for soluble poisons capable of being produced in such quantities as to destroy the vegetation of whole continents, or for breeds of disease germs immunized against all possible antibodies; others strive to produce a vehicle that shall bore its way under the soil like a submarine under the water, or an aeroplane as independent of its base as a sailing-ship; others explore even remoter possibilities such as focusing the sun’s rays through lenses suspended thousands of kilometres away in space, or producing artificial earthquakes and tidal waves by tapping the heat at the earth’s centre. But none of these projects ever comes anywhere near realization, and none of the three super-states ever gains a significant lead on the others. What is more remarkable is that all three powers already possess, in the atomic bomb, a weapon far more powerful than any that their present researches are likely to discover. Although the Party, according to its habit, claims the invention for itself, atomic bombs first appeared as early as the nineteen-forties, and were first used on a large scale about ten years later. At that time some hundreds of bombs were dropped on industrial centres, chiefly in European Russia, Western Europe, and North America. The effect was to convince the ruling groups of all countries that a few more atomic bombs would mean the end of organized society, and hence of their own power. Thereafter, although no formal agreement was ever made or hinted at, no more bombs were dropped. All three powers merely continue to produce atomic bombs and store them up against the decisive opportunity which they all believe will come sooner or later. And meanwhile the art of war has remained almost stationary for thirty or forty years. Helicopters are more used than they were formerly, bombing planes have been largely superseded by self-propelled projectiles, and the fragile movable battleship has given way to the almost unsinkable Floating Fortress; but otherwise there has been little development. The tank, the submarine, the torpedo, the machine gun, even the rifle and the hand grenade are still in use. And in spite of the endless slaughters reported in the Press and on the telescreens, the desperate battles of earlier wars, in which hundreds of thousands or even millions of men were often killed in a few weeks, have never been repeated. None of the three super-states ever attempts any manoeuvre which involves the risk of serious defeat. When any large operation is undertaken, it is usually a surprise attack against an ally. The strategy that all three powers are following, or pretend to themselves that they are following, is the same.

[NOTICE IN THE FOLLOWING IMAGE ALL OF THE NATO BASES THAT RING RUSSIA AND COMPARE THAT TO WHAT THE FOLLOWING TEXT OF 1984 STATES.]

The plan is, by a combination of fighting, bargaining, and well-timed strokes of treachery, to acquire a ring of bases completely encircling one or other of the rival states, and then to sign a pact of friendship with that rival and remain on peaceful terms for so many years as to lull suspicion to sleep. During this time rockets loaded with atomic bombs can be assembled at all the strategic spots; finally they will all be fired simultaneously, with effects so devastating as to make retaliation impossible. It will then be time to sign a pact of friendship with the remaining world power, in preparation for another attack.

THIS IS JUST THE MORE RELEVANT PARTS OF THIS BOOK THAT I FOUND VERY TIMELY ESPECIALLY FOR TODAY'S TIMES.
CONTINUE TO PRAY AT ALL TIMES AND PRAY THE MOST HOLY ROSARY. I THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR PRAYERS FOR ME AS I TOO INCLUDE YOU ALL WHO SUPPORT ME. GOD BLESS!

UPDATE...
KING TRUMP GETS RED CARPET TREATMENT AND VISITS THE WAILING WALL IN ISRAEL.

FOR THE PAST 17 MONTHS I HAVE BEEN WRITING ABOUT HOW TRUMP WOULD BE A MASONIC KING, OR THE 'ILLUMINTI KING,' THAT HAS BEEN IN THE WAITING FOR DECADES BY THESE SECRET SOCIETIES AND BROTHERHOODS.

THE FACT THAT HE HAS BEEN GETTING THE RED CARPET TREATMENT EVERYWHERE HE GOES, AND MADE HISTORY YESTERDAY BY BEING THE FIRST SITTING PRESIDENT TO VISIT THE WAILING WALL, SHOULD A BE A CLEAR INDICATOR OF THIS.

ALSO, IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE HOW THIS TERRORIST ATTACK HAPPENED TO COINCIDE WITH TRUMP'S ISRAEL VISIT. I WAS WAITING TO SEE IF THESE TERRORISTS, LIKE ALL THE OTHER FALSE FLAGS, ALSO HAPPENED TO BE CARRYING THEIR SYRIAN PASSPORTS ON THEM, ALONG WITH OTHER THINGS THAT WOULD SO CONVIENTLY POINT TO SYRIA, JUST LIKE THE PARIS ATTACKERS, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS.
I'M SURE WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE THEY WILL FIND THESE ITEMS POINTING BACK TO SYRIA. IT'S ALL PART OF THE GAME PLAN TO CONTINUE TO GO AFTER SYRIA.

2ND UPDATE...

GEORGE FRIEDMAN: A US attack on North Korea is imminent
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-attack-on-north-korea-is-imminent-george-friedman-says-2017-5
The US is preparing to attack North Korea, according to Geopolitical Futures founder George Friedman—setting the stage for a difficult, messy war with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Speaking Monday to a rapt audience at the 2017 Strategic Investment Conference in Orlando, Friedman said that while it is unlikely the US will take action before President Trump returns home at the weekend, North Korea’s actions appear to have “offered the US no alternative” to a clash.

3RD UPDATE...
MORE HINTS AND PREDICTIVE CONDITIONING OF THE MASSES AS TO WHAT'S COMING!!!

New Jersey Emergency Alert System 'Accidentally' Sends Nuclear Warnings To Some TVs

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-24/new-jersey-emergency-alert-system-accidentally-sends-nuclear-warnings-some-tvs

May 24, 2017

IN TRUMP CONVERSATION WITH DUTERTE ON APRIL 20TH, HE DISCUSSES POSSIBLE NUCLEAR STRIKE AGAINST NORTH KOREA!
https://theintercept.com/2017/05/23/what-trump-and-duterte-said-privately-about-north-korean-nuclear-threat/

Democrats Warn Trump Against Pre-emptive Attack on North Korea

By RICK GLADSTONEMAY 23, 2017

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/world/asia/congress-trump-kim-north-korea-nuclear-direct-talks.html