Sunday, October 28, 2012

WHY DID U.S. NAVY REPLACE ADMIRAL LEADING MIDEAST STRIKE GROUP???

 


THIS WAS JUST ANNOUNCED YESTERDAY, SATURDAY 27TH, 2012. MY QUESTION IS WHY? IT SEEMS VERY SUSPICIOUS AS TO WHY THE U.S. NAVY WOULD SUDDENLY REPLACE AND RECALL THE VERY ADMIRAL LEADING THIS MIDEAST STRIKE GROUP. IT REMINDS ME OF WHAT THE ILLUMINATI LEADERS BACK IN WWII DID TO GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, AND ADMIRAL MACARTHER.
THESE OTHER TWO MILITARY LEADERS ALSO WERE EITHER REASSIGNED OR RELOCATED DUE TO THEIR LOYALTY TO NOT ONLY THEIR ETHICS, AND MORALS, BUT TO THEIR OATHS.
THIS IS ONE THING THE ILLUMINATI CANNOT STAND. SOMEONE WITH A CONSCIENCE! THEY DEAL ONLY WITH THOSE THAT COMPROMISE THEIR INTEGRITY, ETHICS, MORALS, AND DUTY TO GOD AND COUNTRY. SO ANYTIME SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO GO ALONG WITH THE NWO PLAN, ESPECIALLY IN THE MILITARY, THE FIRST THING THEY DO IS REASSIGN HIM/HER.
IT APPEARS THIS ADMIRAL, ADMIRAL CHARLES GAOUETTE, REALIZED EITHER PART OF THE FALSE FLAG PLAN, OR THE WHOLE PLAN. WHO KNOWS, BUT THE FACT THAT THE NAVY ONLY SAYS THAT THEY ARE INVESTIGATING INTO ALLEGATIONS OF INAPPROPRIATE LEADERSHIP JUDGEMENT, THAT IS USUALLY CODE FOR, THIS PERSON DID NOT WANT TO GO ALONG WITH N.W.O PLAN.
BACK IN THE 1940'S, THEY DID THE SAME THING TO DOUGLAS MACARTHER, WHEN HE WANTED TO GO INTO NOT ONLY N. KOREA, BUT EVEN INTO CHINA TO ELIMINATE THE FUTURE THREAT OF COMMUNISM, BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD VERY CLEARLY THAT HE HAD A CLEAR OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO.
BUT HE TOO WAS STOPPED, BECAUSE THE ILLUMINATI AT THAT TIME UNDERSTOOD THAT IN ORDER TO FOMENT THE THIRD WORLD WAR, A STRONG COMMUNIST CHINA WOULD HAVE TO BE IN PLACE IN ORDER TO KEEP THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC GOING, AND IF MACARTHER ELIMINATED THIS THREAT THEN, THEN THERE WOULD BE NO THIRD WORLD WAR, SO THEY ALSO REASSIGNED HIM AS WELL. IT WAS TRUMAN, THE 33RD DEGREE MASON WHO REASSIGNED HIM.
TODAY THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON AGAIN, I SENSE, AND THIS TIME IT WAS DUE TO THIS ADMIRAL'S CONSCIENCE STANDING IN THE WAY OF NOT WANTING TO START WW3. SO THEY REASSIGNED HIM TOO.

Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group.

By Robert Burns
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Navy said Saturday it is replacing the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment.
Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette is being sent back to the USS John C. Stennis’ home port at Bremerton, Wash., in what the Navy called a temporary reassignment. The Navy said he is not formally relieved of his command of the Stennis strike group but will be replaced by Rear Adm. Troy M. Shoemaker, who will assume command until the investigation is completed.
It is highly unusual for the Navy to replace a carrier strike group commander during its deployment.
The Navy did not reveal details of the allegations, citing only an accusation of “inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East. Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Navy’s chief spokesman, declined to discuss the investigation.
The Stennis group deployed from Bremerton in late August and had entered the Navy 5th Fleet’s area of operations in the Middle East on Oct. 17 after sailing across the Pacific. The Stennis made port visits in Thailand and Malaysia on its way to the Middle East.
It deployed four months earlier than scheduled in response to a request by the commander of U.S. Central Command, Marine Gen. James Mattis, to maintain two aircraft carriers in the Middle East. The Stennis replaced the USS Enterprise carrier group.
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta visited the Stennis and its sailors in Bremerton shortly before they departed. He thanked them for accelerating their deployment on short notice.
“I understand that it is tough,” Mr. Panetta said. “We are asking an awful lot of each of you, but frankly you are the best I have, and when the world calls, we have to respond.”

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)