Alien Beings And Their Interaction With Humanity.

The following two articles are from U.K. sources, but Fox News and even CNN were going to be covering the Washington testimony hearings from these U.S. military pilots today.
It is interesting to note that these beings, according to these military personnel, are more interested in preserving the human race than even humans are by deactivating these nuclear missiles.
What's also interesting is that just a few months ago, there were also news reports from Russia, and other nuclear states that these UFO's had also deactivated nuclear missile sites in those countries as well.
Even though this will probably not get too much play here in this country, it is interesting to see how so many secrets that had been kept for so many years are starting to break down and come into full view.
Even things such as these were in prophecy. The next main legend to be confirmed will be the elusive Bigfoot creature. Having studied and given much time and effort to the study of this topic for many years, I never thought I would see the day when mainstream media and military personnel would begin to finally cover and reveal this information.

What's also interesting is that in Frank Water's "Book of The Hopi," written in 1942, Waters who spent several years living with the Hopis in the Southwest United States, includes in his book that the Hopis have a very interesting story regarding the last global period of destruction.

In their story of creation, they include descriptions of beings they call the ant people. These beings, according to the Hopi people, are called this because they resemble ants. They have long thin arms and legs, and big heads with big round eyes, resembling descriptions of how people that have seen these so called ET's throughout history.

The Hopi traditions also states that these beings are creations of the great Creator (God) and serve Him as well, and that they do not communicate such as we do, but rather do so telepathically through the mind (just as people who have made contact with them say they were communicated through their thoughts.)

The Hopi story continues that during the last destruction of the world, the Creator sent these ant people to save only those that were deemed good according to Him, and they did so.

What's interesting also is that according to both scientists today and the Hopis, is that both say that the world has gone through 5 major periods of destruction/extinction and renewal.

But its not just the Hopis, but many Native American groups state the same thing in their stories of creation/destruction as well.

It seems they may know that this age or period is on that precipice once again, and hence are becoming more and more visible throughout the world. As evil increases throughout the world, in thought and deed, The Great Creator of all is about the renew the cycle once more.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4350745/take-me-to-your-leader/

Aliens have deactivated British and US nuclear missiles, say US military pilots
Aliens have landed, infiltrated British nuclear missile sites and deactivated the weapons, according to US military pilots.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/8026971/Aliens-have-deactivated-British-and-US-nuclear-missiles-say-US-military-pilots.html
By Andy Bloxham
Published: 9:28AM BST 27 Sep 2010

The beings have repeated their efforts in the US and have been active since 1948, the men said, and accused the respective governments of trying to keep the information secret.

The unlikely claims were compiled by six former US airmen and another member of the military who interviewed or researched the evidence of 120 ex-military personnel.

The information they have collected suggests that aliens could have landed on Earth as recently as seven years ago.

The men's aim is to press the two governments to recognise the long-standing extra-terrestrial visits as fact.

They are to be presented on Monday 27 September at a meeting in Washington.

One of the men, Capt Robert Salas, said: "The US Air Force is lying about the national security implications of unidentified aerial objects at nuclear bases and we can prove it."

He said said he witnessed such an event first-hand on March 16, 1967, at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana which housed Minuteman nuclear missiles.

Capt Salas continued: "I was on duty when an object came over and hovered directly over the site.

"The missiles shut down - 10 Minuteman missiles. And the same thing happened at another site a week later. There's a strong interest in our missiles by these objects, wherever they come from. I personally think they're not from planet Earth."

Others claim to have seen similar activity in the UK.

Col Charles Halt said he saw a UFO at the former military base RAF Bentwaters, near Ipswich, 30 years ago, during which he saw beams of light fired into the base then heard on the military radio that aliens had landed inside the nuclear storage area.

He said: "I believe that the security services of both the United States and the United Kingdom have attempted - both then and now - to subvert the significance of what occurred at RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practised methods of disinformation."

The site was then the base of the US 81st Tactical Fighter Wing.

Capt Bruce Fenstermacher, a former US Air Force officer, also claims he saw a cigar-shaped UFO hovering above a nuclear base in Wyoming in 1976.
======================================================================== America's X Files: Top U.S. airmen to accuse Air Force of cover-up as they claim UFOs have been deactivating nuclear missiles since 1948
By Daniel Bates
Last updated at 11:02 AM on 27th September 2010
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1315479/UFOs-deactivated-nuclear-missiles-U-S-airmen-accuse-government-cover-up.html#ixzz10iLxhxVL

It may sound like a Spielberg movie plot, but if senior U.S. airmen are to be believed, this scenario is not science fiction.
They claim that since 1948, aliens have been hovering over UK and U.S. nuclear missile sites and deactivating the weapons– once even landing in a British base.
Furthermore, they warn, our governments are hushing the activity up.
Captain Robert Salas, who, along with six others is to break his silence on the subject, said: ‘We’re talking about unidentified flying objects, as simple as that.
‘They’re often known as UFOs, you could call them that.
Disruption: The group of veterans will claim on Monday that several nuclear missiles malfunctioned as UFOs hovered overhead

'We¿re talking about unidentified flying objects, as simple as that': Captain Robert Salas, in an undated image, is set to accuse the U.S. Air Force of lying
‘The U.S. Air Force is lying about the national security implications of unidentified aerial objects at nuclear bases and we can prove it,’ he said.

The former officer said he witnessed such an event first-hand on March 16, 1967, at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana.
‘I was on duty when an object came over and hovered directly over the site.
‘The missiles shut down – ten Minuteman [nuclear] missiles. And the same thing happened at another site a week later. There’s a strong interest in our missiles by these objects, wherever they come from. I personally think they’re not from planet Earth.’
Colonel Charles Halt claims to have seen a UFO at RAF Bentwaters, near Ipswich, one of the few bases in the UK to hold nuclear weapons.
The sighting is said to have taken place 30 years ago. First he saw the object firing beams of light into the base then heard on the military radio that aliens had landed inside the nuclear storage area, he said.
‘I believe that the security services of both the United States and the United Kingdom have attempted – both then and now – to subvert the significance of what occurred at RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practised methods of disinformation.’
The six former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man, are to present declassified information which they claim backs up their findings.
RAF Bentwaters USA airbase in Rendlesham, Suffolk. Aliens fired beams of light at the base 30 years ago, it has been claimed.

Controversial: At the event in Washington on Monday the men will release declassified U.S. government documents which they say back up their claims

They have witness testimony from 120 former or retired military personnel which points to alien intervention at nuclear sites in the U.S. as recently as 2003.
They will urge the authorities to confirm that alien beings have long been visiting Earth.
A press conference today in Washington will also highlight testimony from retired U.S. Air Force Captain Bruce Fenstermacher, whose security team saw a cigar-shaped UFO hovering above FE Warren nuclear base in Wyoming in 1976.

Researcher Robert Hastings, who has written on the subject, explained that so far the aliens appeared interested in ‘mere surveillance’ but warned they seemed to have gone further in some instances.
‘At long last, all of these witnesses are coming forward to say that, as unbelievable as it may seem to some, UFOs have long monitored and sometimes tampered with our nukes,’ he added.

http://www.stripes.com/blogs/stripes-central/stripes-central-1.8040/ufo-expert-aliens-cautioning-humans-on-nukes-1.119813

http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/article/former-air-force-officers-ufos-tampered-with-nuclear-missiles/19647296

http://www.realufos.net/

A Reminder From This Past Summer.

[I wrote this commentary and attached the FT's link regarding the following back on July 14th, 2010. I thought it would be most relevant as a reminder just as we get closer to the November elections.]

In the following article from the Financial Times, I have highlighted in big red print what Rob Shapiro, a former Clinton advisor and Obama supporter, is quoted as saying regarding another 911 type attack or another Oklahoma City bombing.
One of the things to keep in mind here is how the media is very subtly trying to lay the groundwork and foundation in people's minds for another false flag attack.
I have pointed this out in the past few months and you can search this blog to see how many different people, from former presidents to high level intel officials, to Hollywood industry funded by the Illuminati bankers, have all been in unison laying this ground work brick by brick into people's minds of this type of attack.
The official is basically saying that between now and November Obama has to find some way of increasing his popularity and his credit worthiness, and he doesn't see it happening unless there is another 911 or Oklahoma city type event.
So basically, in order to win elections this Fall, this official, Rob Shapiro is indirectly promoting another attack.
May the good Lord protect us from such evil minded people.

Obama faces growing credibility crisis
By Edward Luce in Washington
Published: July 13 2010 18:51
Financial Times
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/434315b2-8ea6-11df-8a67-00144feab49a.html

Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama’s chief spokesman, got into hot water this week for daring to speak the truth – that the Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives in November. But it could be even worse than that.

Contrary to pretty much every projection until now, Democratic control of the Senate is also starting to coming into question. While Mr Obama’s approval ratings have continued to fall, and now hover at dangerously close to 40 per cent according an ABC-Washington Post poll published on Tuesday, the fate of his former colleagues in the Senate looks even worse.

In the past few days polls have shown Republican challengers taking the lead over previously safe Democratic incumbents, such as Barbara Boxer in California and Russ Feingold in Wisconsin. Indeed, given the uniformly negative direction in the numbers, it is now quite possible the Republicans could win the Senate seats formerly held by both President Obama in Illinois, and Joe Biden, vice-president, in Delaware.

Add to that the continuing woes of Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic majority leader, in Nevada, where the Republican party’s recent nomination of Sharron Angle, a far-right and highly eccentric Tea Party supporter, appear to have had no positive effect on Mr Reid’s prospects, and the Grand Old party has a good shot at taking control of both houses of Congress. Worse for Mr Obama, political scientists say that at this stage in the calendar, there is almost nothing he can do about it.

“If you ask me where the silver lining is for President Obama, I have to say I cannot see one,” says Bill Galston, a former Clinton official, who has been predicting for months the Democrats could lose the House. “Just as BP’s failure to cap the well has been so damaging, Obama’s failure to cap unemployment will be his undoing. There is nothing he can do to affect the jobless rate before November.”

The direction of the data could hardly be worse. According to Democracy Corps, a group headed by Stanley Greenberg, a liberal pollster who is a close friend of Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama’s chief of staff, a majority of US citizens see Mr Obama as “too liberal”.

Astonishingly, 55 per cent of citizens think Mr Obama is a “socialist” against only 39 per cent who do not share that diagnosis. The same poll shows 48 per cent support for Republicans against just 42 per cent for Democrats. The numbers are eerily similar to 2006, except that it was George W. Bush’s Republicans who were on the receiving end four years ago.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” says Rob Shapiro, another former Clinton official and a supporter of Mr Obama. “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

The Attack Of The Common Man In Today's "Modern World."

The Common Man

Essay By G.K. Chesterton. (Words written over 70 yrs ago had never had so much relevance for today's so called progressive society where the exception has become the rule.)

The explanation, or excuse, for this essay is to be found in a certain notion, which seems to me very obvious, but which I have never, as it happens, seen stated by anybody else. It happens rather to cut across the common frontiers of current controversy. It can be used for or against Democracy, according to whether that swear-word is or is not printed with a big D. It can be connected, like most things, with religion; but only rather indirectly with my own religion. It is primarily the recognition of a fact, quite apart from the approval or disapproval of the fact. But it does involve the assertion that what has really happened, in the modern world, is practically the precise contrary of what is supposed to have happened there.

The thesis is this: that modern emancipation has really been a new persecution of the Common Man. If it has emancipated anybody, it has in rather special and narrow ways emancipated the Uncommon Man. It has given an eccentric sort of liberty to some of the hobbies of the wealthy, and occasionally to some of the more humane lunacies of the cultured. The only thing that it has forbidden is common sense, as it would have been understood by the common people. Thus, if we begin with the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, we find that a man really has become more free to found a sect. But the Common Man does not in the least want to found a sect. He is much more likely, for instance, to want to found a family. And it is exactly that the modern emancipators are quite likely to begin to frustrate him; in the name of Malthusianism or Eugenics or Sterilisation or at a more advanced stage of progress, probably, infanticide.

It would be a model of modern liberty to tell him that he might preach anything, however wild, about the Virgin Birth, so long as he avoided anything like a natural birth; and that he was welcome to build a tin chapel to preach a twopenny creed, entirely based on the text, "Enoch begat Methuselah", so long as he himself is forbidden to beget anybody. And, as a matter of historical fact, the sects which enjoyed this sectarian freedom, in the seventeenth or eighteenth centuries, were generally founded by merchants or manufacturers of the comfortable, and sometimes of the luxurious classes. On the other hand, it is strictly to the lower classes, to use the liberal modern title for the poor, that such schemes as Sterilisation are commonly directed and applied.

It is the same when we pass from the Protestant world of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to the Progressive world of the nineteenth and twentieth. Here the form of freedom mostly claimed, as a boast and a dogma, is the freedom of the Press. It is no longer merely a freedom of pamphlets but a freedom of papers; or rather, it is less and less a freedom at all, and more and more a monopoly. But the important point is that the process, the test and the comparison are the same as in the first example. Modern emancipation means this: that anybody who can afford it can publish a newspaper. But the Common Man would not want to publish a newspaper, even if he could afford it. He might want, for instance, to go on talking politics in a pothouse or the parlour of an inn. And that is exactly the sort of really popular talk about politics which modern movements have often abolished: the old democracies by forbidding the pothouse, the new dictatorships by forbidding the politics.

Or again, it is the boast of recent emancipated ethics and politics not to put any great restraints upon anybody who wants to publish a book, especially a scientific book, full of psychology or sociology; and perhaps unavoidably full of perversions and polite pornography. As that modern tendency increased, it was less and less likely that the police would interfere very much with a man publishing the sort of book that only the wealthy could publish with sumptuous artistic plates or scientific diagrams. It is much more probable, in most modern societies, ' that the police would be found interfering with a man singing a song, of a coarse and candid description, bawling out a ballad of the grosser sort, or even using the more restrained medium of prose with a similar lack of restraint. Yet there is a great deal to be said for song, or even speech, of the old ribald sort, as compared with writing of the new sort, when it is at once analytic and anarchic. The old obscenity bad a gusto and a great virility even in its violence, which is not easily rendered in a diagram or a table of statistics; and the old was always normal and never had any of the horrors of abnormality. The point is that, here again, the Common Man does not generally want to write a book, whereas he may occasionally want to sing a song. He certainly does not want to write a book on psychology or sociology - or to read, it. But he does want to talk, to sing, to shout, to yell and howl on due and suitable occasions; and, rightly or wrongly, it is when he is thus engaged that he is much more likely to fall foul of a policeman than when he is (as he never is) writing a scientific study of a new theory of sex. The upshot of uplift, in the modern sense, is the same in practice as in the previous examples. In the actual atmosphere of the age, men will still be arrested for using a certain kind of language, long after they cannot be arrested for writing a certain kind of literature.

It would be easy to give other examples; but these contemporary examples are already too continuous to be a coincidence. It is equally true, for instance, that the liberating movement of the eighteenth century, the life in the American and French Revolutions, while it did really vindicate many virtues of republican simplicity and civic liberty, also accepted as virtues several things that were obviously vices: that had been recognised as vices long before, and are now again beginning to be recognised as vices so long afterwards. Where even ambition had once been a pardonable vice, avarice became an utterly unpardonable virtue. Liberal economics too often meant merely giving to those already rich the liberty to grow richer, and magnificently granting to the poor the permission to remain rather poorer than before. It was much more certain that the usurer was released to practise usury than that the peasant was released from the practices of the usurer. It was much more certain that the Wheat Pit was as big as the Bottomless Pit, than that the man who grew wheat would ever be found anywhere except at the bottom.

There was a sense in which "liberal economics" were a proclamation of freedom, for the few who were rich enough to be free. Nobody thought there was anything queer about talking of prominent public men "gambling" in the Wheat Pit. But all this time, there were laws of all kinds against normal human gambling; that is, against games of chance. The poor man was prevented from gambling, precisely because he did not gamble so much as the rich man. The beadle or the policeman might stop children from playing chuckfarthing; but it was strictly because it was only a farthing that was chucked. Progress never interfered with the game of chuck-fortune, because much more than a farthing was being chucked. The enlightened and emancipated age especially encouraged those who chucked away other people's fortunes instead of their own. But anyhow, the comparison remains continuous and clear. Progress, in the sense of the progress that has progressed since the sixteenth century, has upon every matter persecuted the Common Man; punished the gambling he enjoys and permitted the gambling he cannot follow; restrained the obscenity that might amuse him and applauded the obscenity that would certainly bore him; silenced the political quarrels that can be conducted among men and applauded the political stunts and syndicates that can only be conducted by millionaires; encouraged anybody who had anything to say against God, if it was said with a priggish and supercilious accent; but discouraged anybody who had anything to say in favour of Man, in his common relations to manhood and motherhood and the normal appetites of nature. Progress has been merely the persecution of the Common Man.

Progress has a hagiology, a martyrology, a mass of miraculous legends of its own, like any other religion; and they are mostly false and belong to a false religion. The most famous is the fancy that the young and progressive person is always martyred by the old and ordinary person. But it is false. It is the old and ordinary person who is almost always the martyr. It is the old and ordinary person who has been more and more despoiled of all his old and ordinary rights. In so far as this progress progresses, it is far more likely that six million men will be forbidden to go to sleep, because six men say that certain breathing exercises are a substitute for slumber, than that any of the six million somnambulists will wake up sufficiently to clout the six men over their highbrowed but half-witted heads. There is no normal thing that cannot now be taken from the normal man. It is much more likely that a law will be passed to forbid the eating of grain (notoriously the parent of poisons like beer and whisky) than that it will be even faintly suggested, to men of that philosophy, that the economic evil is that men cannot grow grain, and that the ethical evil is that men are still despised for growing it. Given the purely progressive principle, and nothing else as a guide to our future, it is entirely possible that they may be hanged or buried alive for growing it. But of course, in a scientific age, they will be electrocuted - or perhaps only tortured by electricity.

Thus far my thesis is this: that it is not the Uncommon Man who is persecuted; but rather the Common Man. But this brings me into direct conflict with the contemporary reaction, which seems to say, in effect, that the Common Man had much better be persecuted. It is quite certain that many modern thinkers and -writers honestly feel a contempt for the Common Man; it is also quite certain that I myself feel a contempt for those who feel this contempt. But the actual issue must be faced more fully; - because what is called the reaction against democracy is at this moment the chief result of democracy. Now on this quarrel I am democratic, or at least defiant of the attacks of democracy. I do not believe that most modern people have seen the real point of the advantage or disadvantage of popular rule; and my doubt can be very largely suggested and summarised under this title of the Common Man.

To put it briefly; it is now the custom to say that most modern blunders have been due to the Common Man. And I should like to point out what appalling blunders have in fact been due to the Uncommon Man. It is easy enough to argue that the mob makes mistakes; but as a fact it never has a chance even to make mistakes until its superiors have used their superiority to make much worse mistakes. It is easy to weary of democracy and cry out for an intellectual aristocracy. But the trouble is that every
intellectual aristocracy seems to have been utterly unintellectual. Anybody might guess beforehand that there would be blunders of the ignorant. What nobody could have guessed, what nobody could have dreamed of in a nightmare, what no morbid mortal imagination could ever have dared to imagine, was the mistakes of the well-informed. It is true, in a sense, to say that the mob has always been led by more educated men.
It is much more true, in every sense, to say that it has always been misled by educated men. It is easy enough to say the cultured man should be the crowd's guide, philosopher and friend. Unfortunately, he has nearly always been a misguiding guide, a false friend and a very shallow philosopher. And the actual catastrophes we have suffered, including those we are now suffering, have not in historical fact been due to the prosaic practical people who are supposed to know nothing, but almost invariably to the highly theoretical people who knew that they knew everything. The world may learn. by its mistakes; but they are mostly the mistakes of the learned.

To go back no further than the seventeenth century, the quarrel between the Puritans and the populace was originally due to the pride of a few men in being able to read a printed book, and their scorn for people who had good memories, good traditions, good stories, good songs, and good pictures in glass or gold or graven stone, and therefore had less need of books. It was a tyranny of literates over illiterates. But it was the literates who were narrow, sullen, limited and often oppressive; it was the illiterates who were, at least relatively, gay and free and fanciful and imaginative and interested in everything. The Uncommon Men, the elect of the Calvinist theory, did undoubtedly lead the people along the next stretch of the path of progress; but what it led to was a prison. The book-reading rulers and statesmen managed to establish the Scottish Sabbath. Meanwhile, a thousand traditions, of the sort they -would have trampled out, yet managed to trickle down from the medieval poor to the modern poor, and lingering as legends in countless cottages and farmhouses, were collected by Scott (often repeated orally by people who could not read or write) to combine in the construction of the great Scottish Romances, which profoundly moved and partly inspired the Romantic Movement throughout the world.

When we pass to the eighteenth century, we find the same part played by a new and quite contrary party; differing from the last in everything except in being the same sort of rather dried up aristocracy. The new Uncommon Men, now leading the people, are no longer Calvinists, but a dry sort of Deists drying up more and more like Atheists;
and they are no longer pessimists but the reverse; only their optimism is often more depressing than pessimism. There were the Benthamites, the Utilitarians, the servants of the Economic Man; the first Free-Traders. They have the credit of having first made clear the economic theories of the modern state; and the calculations on which were mainly based the politics of the nineteenth century. It was they who taught these things scientifically and systematically to the public, and even to the populace. But what were the things, and what were the theories? Perhaps the best and broadest of them was a most monstrous and mythical superstition of Adam Smith; a theological theory that providence had so made the world that men might be happy through their selfishness; or, in other words, that God would overrule everything for good, if only men could succeed in being sufficiently bad. The intellectuals in this epoch taught definitely and dogmatically that if only men would buy and sell freely, lend or borrow freely, sweat or sack freely, and in practice, steal or swindle freely, humanity would be happy. The Common Man soon found out how happy; in the Slums where they left him and in the Slump to which
they led him.

We need not continue, through the last two centuries, all the tale of the frenzy and folly inflicted by the fickleness of the educated class on the relative stability of the uneducated. The fickle intellectuals next rushed to the other extreme, and became Socialists, despising small property as they had despised popular tradition. It is quite true that these intellectuals had a lucid interval in which they proclaimed some primary truth, along with many priggish falsehoods. Some of them did rightly exalt liberty and human dignity and equality, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence. But even that was so much mishandled that there is now a disposition to deny the truth along with the falsehood. There has been a reaction against Democracy; or, in plain words, the prigs are now too bored even to go on with their normal routine about the Common Man; the familiar routine of oppressing him in practice and adoring him in theory.

I do not adore him, but I do believe in him; at least I believe in him much more than I believe in them. I think the actual history of the relations between him and them, as I have narrated it, is enough to justify my preference. I repeat that they have had all the educational advantages over him; they have always led him; and they have always misled him. And even in becoming reactionaries, they remain as raw and crude as when they were revolutionaries. Their anti-democracy is as much stuffed with cant as their democracy. I need only allude to the detestable new fashion of referring to ordinary men as morons. First, it is pedantry, the dullest form of vanity; for a moron is only the Greek for a fool; and it is mostly sham pedantry, for most of those who mention morons hardly know they are talking Greek, still less why on earth they should. It also involves this moral evil: that a man who says that men are mostly fools knows at least that he has often made a fool of himself; whereas the morons are thought of like monkeys; as if they were a fixed tribe or caste. The Common Man may well be the victim of a new series of tyrannies, founded on this scientific fad of regarding him as a monkey. But it is doubtful whether he can be much more persecuted for having the instincts of a moron, than he has already been for having the instincts of a man.

Asia Pacific Tensions On Verge Of Breakout Wars!

The tensions all over the Asian Pacific rim are on boil, and are about to begin to boil over the brim. Whether they are on the Korean peninsula, or between China and Japan, the battle lines are being drawn up, just they are being drawn up in the middle east and in Latin America.
On the one side you have those that will stand with the old guard, the West, and the those on the other hand that are aligning themselves with the new guard, the east, specifically China.
This evening, there is going to be a crucial vote in the senate regarding whether or not the U.S. will begin to combat the issue of China's currency manipulation. The vote is sure to pass, and if so, then this would bring the tensions from boil, to boiling over.
It's like Bill Clinton said one time, "It's not a good idea to make your banker mad." China would not only retaliate economically, but militarilly this would begin the march towards their support of Iran and N. Korea during W.W.3.
Let us not forget that China also has unresolved issues with Japan for all of the atrocities the Japanese inflicted upon the Chinese during WW2. This debt has not gone unforgotten.

North and South Korea are on the brink of war, a top Russian diplomat has warned, calling for both countries to exercise restraint and sit down for talks.
By Andrew Osborn in Moscow
Published: 12:04AM BST 24 Sep 2010 >R>
AFP

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/8020972/North-and-South-Korea-on-the-brink-of-war-Russian-diplomat-warns.html

In Moscow's bleakest assessment of the situation on the Korean peninsula yet, Russian deputy foreign minister Alexei Borodavkin said tensions between the two countries were running at their highest and most dangerous level in a decade.

"Tensions on the Korean Peninsula could not be any higher. The only next step is a conflict," he told foreign policy experts at a round table on the subject in Moscow.

Tensions bubbled over in March after Washington and Seoul concluded that a North Korean submarine had sunk a South Korean naval vessel in the Yellow Sea. Mr Borodavkin called for the investigation into exactly who was responsible for the sinking of the vessel, the Cheonan, to be urgently closed in order to remove an obvious source of tension.

Describing the standoff between the two Koreas as a "hangover from the Cold War," Mr Bor class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">odavkin said Russia, which is one of the six countries involved in talks with North Korea over its nuclear programme, was doing all it could to try to prevent an outbreak of hostilities.

But he said responsibility for keeping peace in the volatile region was shared equally between North and South Korea. He condemned North Korea's nuclear testing programme but also criticised the way the United States and South Korea had increased their military manoeuvres in the wake of the sinking of the Cheonan.
===================================================
Tensions between China, Japan escalate

Amid a dispute over Japan's detention of a Chinese fishing boat captain, Beijing reportedly cuts off exports of so-called rare earth elements to Japan, which are used in high-tech products including hybrid vehicles.

China and North Korea deepen ties during Kim Jong Il visit
By John M. Glionna and David Pierson, Los Angeles Times >
September 23, 2010 Continue rest of story at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fg-china-japan-spat-20100923,0,4905884.story?track=rss

Up, Up and Away For Gold!!!

Last week, a so called gold expert on one of the financial news channels mentioned that he thought gold would hit the 1,300 mark within 6 months. As I read his statement, I calmly thought to myself this would be reached more within 6 days.
Today, not even a week later (I read this expert's analysis on Thursday of last wk), we are at currently at 1,288.00, or at least that is where the Comex closed at today.
But following good ol' Bernanke's statements about flooding the world with even more potential liquidity, that would spell doom for the dollar as well as every other currency that has the Dollar as a reserve basis, but it would be an all time break out point for not only gold but all precious metals!
Back in 2006, when I first began to urge people to get into precious metals, gold was at 730.00 and silver was at 7-9.00, an oz.
Not only has gold not even reached its climax, but it hasn't even begun to reach the heights that it will reach.
If you take into account how many dollars are floating out there in the world, and how many more are on the verge of being out there, whether real or virtual, the price or rather value of gold is on the verge of going stratospheric.
This is my 200th posting on this site. I hope and pray that all of these postings have in some way or other helped you all in further preparations for these coming dark times.
May God bless you all and thank you for your support.

Focus: Update: Gold Resumes Uptrend Following FOMC Statement
21 September 2010, 4:05 p.m. EST
By Allen Sykora
Of Kitco News
http://www.kitco.com/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-21/fed-says-it-s-prepared-to-ease-further-refrains-from-new-asset-purchases.html

(Kitco News) -- Gold resumed its uptrend after Federal Reserve policy-makers said Tuesday that they are willing to undertake further action to prop up the economy, with the metal moving to record highs.

Still, some cautioned that gold could be due for a corrective pullback in a market that already has so much bullish enthusiasm.

Gold finished the Comex pit session weaker, which was blamed largely on profit-taking ahead of the release of a post-meeting statement from the Federal Open Market Committee. As most expected, the Fed did not undertake quantitative easing, in which it would buy debt instruments such as Treasury bonds to help push down long-term yields. However, the Fed language was construed to mean this is a distinct possibility down the road, supporting gold prices.

“The FOMC will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and is prepared to provide additional accommodation if needed to support the economic recovery and return inflation, over time, to levels consistent with its mandate,” the statement said.

This demonstrated a bias toward easing, said a report from Nomura Global Economics. “Unless the incoming data improves significantly, we believe a resumption of (quantitative easing) at the November FOMC meeting is now quite likely,” Nomura said.

Around 3:30 p.m. EDT (1930 GMT), spot gold was up $6.90 to $1,285.40 an ounce, compared to $1,272 about 10 minutes ahead of the Fed statement. December gold on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange was $6.90 higher at $1,287.70, compared to $1,273.30 ahead of time. In after-hours trading following the Fed statement, the December futures went on to a high of $1,290.40; that is a fresh record for a most-active Comex contract.

“They all but confirmed (quantitative easing),” said Zachary Oxman, managing director of TrendMax Futures. “That’s extremely weak for the dollar and very strong for gold, as you saw a big spike up through $1,290. I think we see $1,300 before the week is out and I am still thinking of $1,400 to $1,500 by year-end.”

The Fed statement left the U.S. dollar under pressure, adding support to gold, said Bob Haberkorn, senior market strategist with Lind-Waldock. The metal often moves inversely to the dollar, bought as a hedge against greenback weakness and because a lower dollar makes commodities cheaper in other currencies and thus helps demand.

“I anticipate gold could get through this $1,300 pretty quickly,” Haberkorn said.

Some market participants had already been pricing in potential for quantitative easing in recent sessions, said Michael Gross, broker and futures analyst with OptionSellers.com.

“So when we actually got the announcement that they weren’t doing it now but could in the future, it’s pretty much what everybody expected them to say,” Gross said. “So I don’t think it’s a big bullish surprise for gold by any means. It looks like we got a little lift from it because the dollar is falling more sharply than a lot of people expected it would.”

Now, technical considerations might be limiting gold’s upside in the short term in a market that is “tremendously overbought,” Gross said. “We think there is such a long position in gold right now that it may have a hard time trading substantially higher before it’s had a little correction first,” he said. Still, he also looks for gold to eventually hit $1,300, especially if the dollar weakens further on additional quantitative easing.

The most recent data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission showed that managed-money accounts were net long by 227,384 lots for futures and options combined as of Sept. 14, approaching the high of 238,943 from last October. When large speculators become excessively long, traders sometimes view this as a hint that a short-term reversal might be in order as some traders sell to book profits and the market runs out of potential buying ammunition.

Ahead of the Fed meeting, most analysts said they did not expect quantitative easing as soon as Tuesday, with policy-makers instead likely to wait to see whether there is more significant deterioration in the economy. Thus, many had expected that the lack of a quantitative-easing announcement might have led to some profit-taking that would have pressured gold, rather than the price rise that occurred.

There was profit-taking, but this seemed to have already run its course in the run-up to the FOMC statement, said Michael Zarembski, senior commodities analyst with optionsXpress. Had gold been higher at the time, he said, the metal may well have turned lower. But with gold already on the defensive, that meant lower prices were seen as a bargain-hunting opportunity, he said.

NBC's "The Event."---A Foreshadowing?

NBC's The Event premiered tonight and it was very interesting to say the least. In the first episode from tonight's premier, the plot centered around a mysterious disappearance of a woman on a cruise that would lead to the uncovering of a major conspiracy.
From the beginning of the program 13 was a prominent number throughout the show, interestingly also a very prominent and important number in Illuminati numerology.
Also recall that on March 4, 2001, another pilot aired on fox called, "The Lone Gunmen." I have attached the following website regarding this pilot episode in which it depicts a government plot to crash a hijacked Boeing in the world trade center towers. http://killtown.911review.org/lonegunmen.html

It is interesting to note that in today's pilot episode on NBC, the plot also revolved around another conspiracy, but this one revealed a plane that was on course to hit the president's compound. What occurred just as the plane was about to hit the compound resembled very much would looked like an EMP attack.
The previews for next week's episode reveals that the plot continues to revolve around a potential false flag attack on the character that plays president Martinez.
This character portrays a black president that has a Cuban background, but appears to be one of the targets in this series.
If history is any indicator, then I would suggest to continue watching this series.

Those In The Know Are Buying Huge Put Options For A 2010 Market Crash?

Today there were several key pieces of news that most mainstream media outlets probably didn't focus on too much as usual.
One of these was the fact that gold hit another all time record at noon time today of about 1274.00, before settling back down at around the 1270.00 mark. Silver too is poised to break out to all time highs as well.
This, along with news from around the world that central banks throughout are increasing their gold supplies, as are Russia and China, should continue to send the yellow metal to even higher positions. Especially when in the past 2 years there have been reports that several shipments that have been made from western nations have been found to have been fake tungsten bars, should also contribute to the increase of this very precious commodity.
If gold was actually priced according to the standards the U.S. used to measure its value as per the 1970's early 80's, the price should actually be around the 6,500 dollar mark per oz!!!
But with new creative accounting standards and inflationary measures that allow for ultimate price control of the metal, it is barely approaching the 1300 mark.
Another sign that things are not as smooth as the powers that be make it out to be is the fact that the Yen, another heavily indebted currency, is reaching all time highs against the Dollar, the king of all indebted currencies. This should also be sending red flags to many that there is something not right in the global picture.
The Treasuries too in the past several weeks have been reaching some very low yields as this bubble too gets ready to pop!
And the following website also makes reference to how smart money investors in the past few days have been purchasing huge put option contracts for October, as if to expect a major market down turn.
In my humble opinion, this will be the case in large part due to the attack that will come upon Iran. Oil will go above the 200 Dollars a barrel mark, gold would initially shoot up to around 3,500, and the markets world wide would reel and be very heavily affected.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_7aCsUeCwQ

IMF Issues Catastrophic Warning For Global Economies!

World Economy: "IMF Issues Catastrophic Warning"
IMF Issues Catastrophic Warning As France Calls For End Of US Hegemony"
By Sorcha Faal

"In a shock warning to a World entering its third year of Global economic chaos, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Dominique Strauss-Kahn, stated today that the unemployment situation facing all Nations has now become a “catastrophic situation” that is “unparalleled” and is fast leading to the creation of a “lost generation” of human beings numbering in the hundreds of millions. Strauss-Kahn’s grim warning follows on the heels of French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling for the end of US hegemony and the establishment of a new International monetary system he plans to propose at the upcoming G-20 summit in November and supported by the emerging economies of China, India, Brazil and Russia, who, like Sarkozy, are angered by the collapsing American Dollar's supremacy. These shocking developments also follow the United States surprise move this past month wherein the Americans called for shifting the balance of power over the Global economy from the West to East by allowing the so called emerging economies of the Middle East, South America and Asia to dominate the IMF, and hence control World economic power.

The response of the United States, where the top 1 percent of American earners now take home nearly a quarter of Americans’ total income, to these latest grim developments appears on its face to be one of shocking complacency with reports showing that Obama has scheduled a week of White House parties instead of working to prevent the total economic collapse of his Nation. Obama’s actions in partying now is significant because it is happening at the same time American investors are using options to brace for big swings this week as Wall Street enters the peak of the most volatile month for stocks historically, and which Brian Overby, a senior options analyst at online brokerage TradeKing in Charlotte, North Carolina, states “this week is the real start of a month to be nervous about.” Even more ominously for the United States are the many historical warnings pointing to their soon to come total economic collapse that we had previously written about in our reports Hindenburg Omen Warned Spells ‘Final Doom’ For America and “Triffin Paradox” Collapse Of US Economy Sends Shockwaves Around World.

To how catastrophic Obama’s economic polices been to the United States we can see in newly released US government statistics showing that under his leadership the poverty rate in America has soared to levels not seen since the early 1960’s, numbers so horrific they led then President John F. Kennedy to declare his famous War On Poverty. Unlike the early 1960’s, though, Obama has no economic power to launch his own war on poverty as the millions of jobs lost under his Presidency are warned will never come back and likening the conditions he is facing to those of the Great Depression era President Franklin Roosevelt, rather than those of Kennedy. And in comparing the present day actions of Obama against those of Roosevelt one can sadly see with great clarity his ‘master plan’, so to speak, to keep himself and his elite cronies in power for decades to come, a future of unending Global wars increasing to such size and magnitude our whole Planet will be engulfed.

To fully understand this, especially if you’re an American, you have to remember the pivotal year of 1937 which saw the United States still in the grip of a nearly decade long economic depression set into motion by their historic October 1929 Stock Market Crash, and which up to that year Roosevelt, and all of the polices and laws he enacted, still failed to break. Faced with an enraged US Congress and American electorate who had lost faith in his New Deal because of the staggering size and scope of their National budget deficit, made even worse by the fact that all of the money spent had not only not ended the Great Depression but made it worse, Roosevelt cut back on his economic stimulus plan in what experts today call his single most disastrous move and launching what is called The Recession of 1937.

To see how frightenly those times now mirror our own one only need see the results of a Gallup poll conducted in March, 1938 which asked Americans whether government spending should be increased to fight the slump and 63% of those polled said no. Asked whether it would be better to increase spending or to cut business taxes, only 15% favored spending; 63% favored tax cuts. Equally to consider as a mirror from that time to ours today was the 1938 election that was a total disaster for Roosevelt and his Democratic Party, who lost 70 seats in the House and 7 in the Senate.

Now the most important thing to remember is that Roosevelt, like Obama today, in knowing that he would surely be defeated in the 1940 Presidential election, and having the vast majority of the US Congress and American people fed up with his New Deal socialist polices, had one last trump card to play to stimulate the economy of the United States, TOTAL GLOBAL WAR! So, in 1937, Roosevelt began a series of seemingly contradictory US foreign policy moves both benefiting and antagonizing the powers of the Empires of Japan and Germany and fascist Italy thus positioning the United States to be a combatant in a World War the American people overwhelmingly wanted nothing to do with.

So strident were the American peoples objection to what they called ‘Roosevelt’s War’ that two of the United States greatest public spokesman of the time, aviation hero Charles Lindberg (refused to return a medal given to him by Nazi Germany) and US auto giant Henry Ford (Ford and Hitler were great admirers of each other), started an anti-war movement known today as America First that sought to keep their country from war. Roosevelt’s plan for World War was almost undone with Nazi Germany’s September, 1939 invasion of Poland due to secret pact between Adolph Hitler and Soviet Leader Joseph Stalin that allowed Soviet Russian troops to invade at the exact same time from the East as German soldiers were invading from the West.

Though both Great Britain and France had a mutual defense pact with Poland, and under pressure from Roosevelt, they declared war on Nazi Germany setting off World War II, but not on the Soviet Union, a move none of the Allied Powers have every allowed to be explained to their citizens. Roosevelt’s trade polices against the Empire of Japan led that Asian Nation in 1937 to begin its conquest of China, and other Asian neighbors as it sought oil and raw materials denied it by the Americans, and which without their economy would collapse.

The United States Presidential election of 1940 was fought in the shadow of World War II as the United States was emerging from the Great Depression and Roosevelt broke with tradition and ran for a third term. The surprise Republican candidate was maverick businessman Wendell Willkie, a dark horse who crusaded against Roosevelt's failure to end the Great Depression and eagerness for war. Roosevelt, aware of the strong isolationist sentiment in the US promised there would be no foreign wars if he was reelected, and he was.

Unbeknownst to the American people, however, Roosevelt’s plan for plunging his Nation into war was just starting, and which he vastly accelerated, in early 1941, after his inauguration by enacting Public Law 77-11 (also known as The Lend Lease Act) which was a program under which the US supplied the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, China, France and other Allied Nations with vast amounts of war material amounting to over $50 Billion. (In today’s dollars equal to $1 Trillion.) By late 1941 Roosevelt’s ‘master plan’ for plunging his people into war was realized, and in the words of the Noble Prize winning American economist Paul Krugman resulted in:

“From an economic point of view World War II was, above all, a burst of deficit-financed government spending, on a scale that would never have been approved otherwise. Over the course of the war the federal government borrowed an amount equal to roughly twice the value of G.D.P. in 1940 — the equivalent of roughly $30 trillion today.

Had anyone proposed spending even a fraction that much before the war, people would have said the same things they’re saying today. They would have warned about crushing debt and runaway inflation. They would also have said, rightly, that the Depression was in large part caused by excess debt — and then have declared that it was impossible to fix this problem by issuing even more debt.

But guess what? Deficit spending created an economic boom — and the boom laid the foundation for long-run prosperity. Overall debt in the economy — public plus private — actually fell as a percentage of G.D.P., thanks to economic growth and, yes, some inflation, which reduced the real value of outstanding debts. And after the war, thanks to the improved financial position of the private sector, the economy was able to thrive without continuing deficits.”

And so today, as the United States sinks ever deeper into its latest Great Depression, as millions of its people remain hungry and homeless, as tens of millions more remain jobless, as their poverty rate skyrockets to levels not seen since the early 1960’s, as all of the historical indicators point to stock market crash of unprecedented proportions, as millions of them rally against their governments spending their children’s future away, ‘partying’ Obama has just announced the largest arms sale in American history to of all places Saudi Arabia. For these self deluded people not to see the proverbial ‘writing on the wall’ of what their future is soon going to look like is beyond imagining, but nonetheless real."

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1405.htm
Read the original story at CoyotePrime

==========================================================================
Doomsday warnings of US apocalypse gain ground
Sep 12 07:15 AM US/Eastern
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a64b6fa820c23d9ef2058a22276ce3a1.2c1&show_article=1

Economists peddling dire warnings that the world's number one economy is on the brink of collapse, amid high rates of unemployment and a spiraling public deficit, are flourishing here.
The guru of this doomsday line of thinking may be economist Nouriel Roubini, thrust into the forefront after predicting the chaos wrought by the subprime mortgage crisis and the collapse of the housing bubble.

"The US has run out of bullets," Roubini told an economic forum in Italy earlier this month. "Any shock at this point can tip you back into recession."

But other economists, who have so far stayed out of the media limelight, are also proselytizing nightmarish visions of the future.

Boston University professor Laurence Kotlikoff, who warned as far back as the 1980s of the dangers of a public deficit, lent credence to such dark predictions in an International Monetary Fund publication last week.

He unveiled a doomsday scenario -- which many dismiss as pure fantasy -- of an economic clash between superpowers the United States and China, which holds more than 843 billion dollars of US Treasury bonds.

"A minor trade dispute between the United States and China could make some people think that other people are going to sell US treasury bonds," he wrote in the IMF's Finance & Development review.

"That belief, coupled with major concern about inflation, could lead to a sell-off of government bonds that causes the public to withdraw their bank deposits and buy durable goods."

Kotlikoff warned such a move would spark a run on banks and money market funds as well as insurance companies as policy holders cash in their surrender values.

"In a short period of time, the Federal Reserve would have to print trillions of dollars to cover its explicit and implicit guarantees. All that new money could produce strong inflation, perhaps hyperinflation," he said.

"There are other less apocalyptic, perhaps more plausible, but still quite unpleasant, scenarios that could result from multiple equilibria."

According to a poll by the StrategyOne Institute published Friday, some 65 percent of Americans believe there will be a new recession.

And the view that America is on a decline seems rather well ingrained in many people's minds supported by 65 percent of people questioned in a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll published last week.

"It is true: Today's economic problems are structural, not cyclical," argued New York Times editorial writer David Brooks.

He said the United Sates is losing its world dominance much in the same way the British Empire began to crumble more than a century ago.

"We are in the middle of yet another jobless recovery. Wages have been lagging for decades. Our labor market woes are deep and intractable," Brooks said.

Nobel Economics Prize winner Paul Krugman also voiced concern about the fate of the fragile economic recovery if voters return the Republicans to political power.

"It's hard to overstate how destructive the economic ideas offered earlier this week by John Boehner, the House minority leader, would be if put into practice," he wrote in a recent editorial.

"Fewer jobs and bigger deficits -- the perfect combination."

The Wall Street Journal, usually more favorable to Boehner's call for tax cuts, ran a commentary from another Nobel Prize-winning economist -- Vernon Smith -- that failed to provide much comfort for readers.

"This fact needs to be confronted: We are almost surely in for a long slog," Smith wrote.

And it seems such pessimism has even filtered into the IMF, which warned on Friday that high levels of national debt and a still shaky financial sector threaten to derail the global economic recovery.

"The foreclosure backlog in US property markets is large and growing, in part due to the recent expiration of the home buyer's tax credit. When realized, this could further depress real estate prices."

This could lead to "disproportionate losses" for small and medium-sized banks, which could in turn "precipitate a loss of market confidence in the recovery," the IMF warned.

China And Russia To Eliminate The Dollar From Global Trade.

As further proof that prophecy is currently materializing before our very eyes, we read the following article from Bloomberg news.

Just as all prophecy has it, China and Russia, along with Iran, Turkey, North Korea and Venezuela, are all beginning to rise against the nations of the west.

China and Russia will not only become the future economic power houses, but will also become the world's most powerful militarily as well.

World War 3 will forever shift this current balance of power as it has stood for the past five hundred years.

The U.S., along with the rest of the Illuminati controlled west will not go peaceful into that dark night, and hence the reason for this coming world war.

Yuan Trading Against Russian Ruble Said to Start Within Weeks in Shanghai
By Artyom Danielyan and Emma O’Brien -
Sep 8, 2010 6:54 AM CT
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-08/china-russia-push-yuan-ruble-trading-to-diminish-dominance-of-u-s-dollar.html

China and Russia plan to start trading in each other’s currencies as the world’s second-biggest energy consumer and the largest energy supplier seek to diminish the dollar’s role in global trade.

China may start trading its currency against the ruble within weeks, three bankers with knowledge of the matter told Bloomberg, and sent out a document last week allowing lenders to apply for ruble trading licenses, one of them said. Russia’s Micex Stock Exchange is making preparations to trade the ruble against the yuan in an initiative that has the backing of the country’s central bank, Ruben Aganbegyan, the head of the bourse, told reporters at a conference in Moscow today.

“Given the risk to the dollar and U.S. assets from their fiscal position they want to reduce their dependence on the dollar as an invoicing currency,” Bhanu Baweja, global head of emerging markets fixed income, currency and credit research at UBS AG, said in a phone interview from London. “It makes sense for two large economies to exclude a third, overly dominant economy from their trading equation.”

In the wake of the global financial crisis, which forced the U.S. economy into recession, both China and Russia have called for the dollar’s role in the financial system to be diluted. Volatility in major currencies is putting the global recovery at risk Zhang Ping, the head of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, said last month. President Dmitry Medvedev last year suggested Russia, holder of the world’s third-largest foreign-currency reserves, reduce its holdings of dollar.

Yuan-Ringgit Trading

The yuan slid 0.06 percent to 6.7953 per dollar today paring its gains since the central bank ended a two-year dollar peg on June 19 to 0.4 percent. Russia’s ruble weakened 0.3 percent to 30.9225 per dollar by 2:15 p.m. in Moscow today, and has fallen 2.1 percent versus the greenback so far this year.

The euro gained 0.2 percent to 1.2712 per dollar today, and jumped 2.5 percent against the U.S. currency last year.

The People’s Bank of China started yuan trading against the Malaysian ringgit between banks on Aug. 19. It already allows trading of the renminbi versus the dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, Japanese yen and the euro on its interbank market and China’s Foreign Exchange Trading Center provides daily reference rates for these currencies. The yuan is a non-deliverable currency that is managed by the central bank to prevent volatility.

‘Fully Convertible’

The ruble, which Bank Rossii targets against a dollar-euro basket, is a “fully convertible” currency and some Chinese banks have already been allowed to open ruble trading accounts, Russia’s Deputy Finance Minister Dmitry Pankin told reporters in Moscow today. The opening of cross-currency trade between the yuan and the ruble is more important for China, he said. “They are gradually allowing more currency operations with yuan,” he said.

China overtook Germany as Russia’s second-largest trading partner in the first six months of the year, helped by exports of Russian commodities such as aluminum, nickel and oil and gas. Trade between China and Russia jumped 50 percent to $30.7 billion in the first seven months of this year, compared with the same period in 2009, China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Aug. 21.

The world’s fastest-growing economy is seeking to eliminate the need to convert yuan holdings in to dollars before converting in to rubles to pay for Russian commodities, Baweja said.

Dollar Elimination

“China wants to reduce the volatility in its access to primary goods,” he said. “They want to reduce their dependence on the dollar in trade transactions.”

HSBC Bank (China) Co. and Bank of Communications Co. completed the first yuan-ringgit transactions, according to the Foreign Exchange Trading Center, which is affiliated with the central bank. The central bank was investigating the possibility of offering new currency pairs on the interbank market, including ruble, won and ringgit, an unnamed official at the center said in April.

“Gradually the dollar is being eliminated from the foreign-trade settlement flows,” said Dariusz Kowalczyk, a Hong-Kong based senior economist at Credit Agricole CIB. “People are beginning to trade Asian currencies without intermediation via the dollar.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Artyom Danielyan in Moscow at adanielyan@bloomberg.net; Emma O’Brien at eobrien6@bloomberg.net; Belinda Cao in Beijing at lcao4@bloomberg.net

The Woman Clothed With The Sun, With The Moon Under Her Feet.

"Then the sanctuary of God in the heavens was opened, and the Ark of the Covenant of God could be seen inside the sanctuary. There were flashes of lightening, peals of thunder, an earthquake and a violent hailstorm.

A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman, clothed with the sun, with a moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head." Rev11-19,12:1.

One of the many titles the Virgin Mary has is, The Ark of the Covenant of God, for it was she who, just as the original covenant carried the Law of God (Ten Commandments through the desert for 40 years), she carried God incarnate through the desert for 40 weeks until His birth.

It is interesting to see how prophecy is unfolding before our very eyes. Throughout various prophecies, many of which can be referenced on the various postings on this blog, there appears the constant prophecies of the rise of Islam and hence the crescent moon of Islam is this symbol.

In the book, "The Forty Letters Of Preparation For the End of An Age," the prophecies regarding this global war are specifically referenced as well as to the reason why the west, or the Christian west, will be allowed to be castigated by those countries that are not of Judeo Christian origin.

The prophet Ezekiel and Jeremiah are very specific as the reasons why western Europe and North America will come under severe persecution and many will live in exile of their native lands in foreign lands.

This brings me to the following point. If we notice in the image of the Our Lady of Guadalupe (Virgin Mary), we notice how she is standing on a black crescent moon. We also notice the rays of the sun behind her, so she is clothed with the sun.

When the scrolls of the Bible were first written, there were no chapters or verses, everything read as a whole. It was not until the Canon of Scripture was decided upon in the late 300's early 400's, that the Catholic Church had included the many chapters and verses.

The image first appeared in 1531, when Juan Diego, a peasant of Native American blood in Mexico, first exhibited the image which had be miraculously emblazoned on his tilma (native garb).

The image, on the original tilma, has since been guarded and displayed in cathedral of the shrine of Guadalupe in Mexico city.

But the image is one of the end times due to the fact that its image clearly portrays the description as written in the Book of Revelation as per the account of St. John the evangelist.

The fact that she is standing on a black crescent moon also points the fact that after this world war, Islam will come to dominate many former Christian countries as well. This will be allowed to occur due to the fact that many of these former Christian countries have lost the faith and become idol worshipping, atheistic nations.

But the fact that she is standing on the moon also represents an ultimate victory, for it is found throughout the Bible that the image of standing on something else, always represents victory of one over the other.

The following article refers to what prophecy has stated would occur, specifically to Western Europe. The fact that this Egyptian cleric claims that Islam will conquer Italy, is prophetic in and of itself!

For it is found throughout all prophecy, whether Biblical or non Biblical, that these forces will even come to destroy the Vatican and spread all the way to Spain. All sin has its consequences, and the wickedness of today's world is primed to receive what it has sown for so many years.

And this ultimate victory will not be over one religion over another, but rather God's over the evil of the devil. For it is written that all will come to the realization of who Jesus is, and all will come to conversion.

Egyptian TV: 'Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West'
by Hillel Fendel

MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) has released a transcript of excerpts from a televised sermon given by Egyptian cleric Salem Abu Al-Futuh. Airing on Al-Nas TV on August 18, it features Al-Futuh’s confident predictions that Islam will take over the entire West, beginning specifically with Italy and ending with North and South America.
The transcript of Salem Abu Al-Futuh’s talk:

The nation of Islam will return – despite our current crisis and despite the arrogance of the West. The West is bound to be destroyed. Just like Allah destroyed the Byzantine and Persian empires, he will destroy the West at the hands of the Muslims. This is an unequivocal promise. These countries will convert to Islam. Islam will reach these countries.

… Let us examine the divine sequence: First, the Caliphate will return. Then, the Muslims will live in tremendous prosperity. The economy of the Muslims will be the strongest of all. You are probably thinking that I'm not well today if I say such things. By God, there's nothing wrong with me. I am speaking words of truth.

…Great conquests will ensue. We will conquer Italy… By Allah, we will conquer Italy. By Allah, we will conquer Italy and move into [the rest] of Europe. Islam will enter that entire region. Even America, you ask? Yes, even America. North or South America? Both North and South America. We will enter all these countries, and people there will be joining Islam in droves.

Al Nas TV is an Islamic religious channel in Egypt, providing Islamic programming for Muftis (Muslim scholars). Al-Futuh is a young, relatively unknown cleric, whose mentions on the internet appear to revolve solely around his above threat to capture Italy and the entire West. Similar threats are commonly made by other Muslim clerics, as widely documented by MEMRI and Palestinian Media Watch – yet do not cause the kind of international controversy spawned by recent prayers by Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef for the downfall of Jewry’s Arab enemies

Stephen Hawking's New God---Gravity [A Rebuttal]

Stephen Hawking's New god...
Gravity!

Famed theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking now says definitely that God did not create the universe or spark the Big Bang. Rebuttal

In his new book, "The Grand Design," scheduled for a September release, Hawking argues that the universe didn't need divine inspiration to come into being.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing," writes Hawking. "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists why we exist.

"It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going," he writes, according to excerpts published in the Times of London today.

Hawking, who co-wrote "The Grand Design" with Leonard Mlodinow, a U.S. physicist, has come to this position fairly recently.

In June, when ABC News' Diane Sawyer asked him about the biggest mystery he'd like solved, Hawking said, "I want to know why the universe exists, why there is something greater than nothing."

"What could define God ... as the embodiment of the laws of nature. However, this is not what most people would think of that God," Hawking told Sawyer. "They made a human like being with whom one can have a personal relationship. When you look at the vast size of the universe and how insignificant an accidental human life is in it, that seems most impossible."

When Sawyer asked if there was a way to reconcile religion and science, Hawking told her, "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works."

I would now like to respond to Mr. Hawking in regards to his candid, but misdirected thoughts.
I will begin by quoting a very famous atheist that later in life became a devout Christian...C.S. Lewis.
In his book, Mere Christianity, Mr. Lewis says the following regarding human nature:

"Everyone has heard of people quarrelling. Sometimes it sounds funny and sometimes it sounds merely unpleasant; but however it sounds, I believe we can learn something very important from listening to the kind of things they say. They say things like: 'How'd you like it if anyone did the same to you?'---'That's my seat, I was there first!'---'Leave him alone, he isn't doing you any harm!'---'Give me a bit of your orange, I gave you a bit of mine.'---'Come on, you promised!'
People say things like that every day, educated as well as uneducated, and children as well as grown ups.
Now what interests me about all these remarks is that the man who makes them is not merely saying that the other man's behaviour does not happen to please him, rather he is also appealing to some kind of standard of behaviour which he expects the other man/person to also know about. And the other man very seldom replies: 'To hell with your standard!' Nearly always he/she tries to make out that what he has been doing does not really go against the standard, or that if it does, there is some special excuse.
He pretends there is some special reason in this particular case why the person who took the seat first should not keep it, or that things were quite different when he was given the bit of orange, or that something has turned up which lets him off from keeping his/her promise.
It looks, in fact, very much as both parties had in mind some kind of law, or Rule of fair play or decent behaviour or morality or whatever you like to call it, about which they both really agreed. And they have. If they had not, they might, of course, fight like animals, but they could not quarrel in the human sense of the word.
Quarrelling means trying to show that the other person is wrong. And there there would be no sense in trying to do that unless you and he had some sort of agreement as to what was Right and Wrong are; just as there would be no sense in saying that a footballer had committed a foul unless there was some agreement about the rules of football.
Now this Law, or Rule about Right and Wrong used to be called the Law of Nature. Nowadays, when we talk of the 'law of nature' we usually mean things like gravitation, or heredity, or the laws of chemistry. But when the older thinkers called the Law of Right and Wrong, the 'Law of Nature,' they really meant the law of human nature.
The idea was that just as all bodies are governed by the law of gravity, and organisms by the biological laws, so too the creature called Man also had his law---with this great difference---That a body could not choose whether it obeyed the law of gravity, but a man could choose (through free will) either to obey the law of Human Nature or disobey it."

It is here where such simplicity, humility and common sense, trumps the complex, proud and non-sensical theory that Mr. Hawking has proposed. For it is according to Hawking's own theory, that if everything owes its existence to the universal laws of gravity, then how is that he is able to even choose this theory over another? His mere free will in the matter does away with his own theory.

Another point to make is this---According to Mr. Hawking, gravity is the answer to all existence. He proclaims that it is through the laws of gravity that something (matter) came into being. (For this has always been his problem...how to explain how matter came into being out of nothing???) He attempt to posit his theory on the laws of gravity and how these laws can do such a miraculous thing.

But the problem he runs into now is the following. Let us suppose that the universe was like a huge blank portrait, waiting to be drawn, sketched and painted upon. The portrait would adhere to certain a certain art code that would instruct any and all instructions as it came into being.

The only problem here is that the potential art work would be limited due to the fact that there was NO artist!!!! Would the portrait paint/create itself??? Would the portrait create its own art rules and codes to follow?? How would the portrait relay the emotions of love, caring, hope, charity, bravery and anger on its own blank canvas??? And if it was able to do this, how would it explain these intangible elements that create the basis for all human emotion that is found in all human nature???

Nothing that is man made ever created itself, it all stemmed from a mind that first conceived the thought and followed through with the act of procreating, through the act of manipulating matter and concluding with a finished product, the end. The material world has one limitation, it cannot explain itself, it always needs a mind.

Yet everything that is man-made has a design, a pattern, an order to it. How much more intricate and complex is the universe and its design, pattern and order. Or perhaps the universe at a sub atomic level with its design, patterns and order. Whether you look at the world through a microscope or a telescope, you can not help but see a pattern a design an order that is not man made, but rather divinely made.

It would be a coincidence if one were to come across a snowflake that resembled a heart, but it would be a miracle if one were to come across one that had a detailed map of New York city; and yet each and every snowflake is an individual, unique pattern of geometry in and of itself, just like every fingerprint. Its a coincidence if any stick can fill any hole, but its a definite miracle with a purpose in mind that creates a key that opens a complex lock.

The irony here is that Mr. Hawking and other great minds such as his have always sought to do away with religion, while in the process creating a new religion. In this case, the religion where gravity is god. But in all cases, further demonstrate the human limits of their human nature and thought.

Iran To Destroy Israel In Nuclear War.

Iran threatens Israel's Dimona reactor, will destroy Israel in nuclear war
DEBKAfile Special Report

September 4, 2010, 9:21 AM (GMT+02:00)

A top Iranian general said Friday, Sept. 3: "Iran hopes there won't be a need to target the nuclear facility of the Zionist regime, but if there is, Israel would receive dreadful retribution." Gen. Hasan Firouzabadi, supreme commander of Iran's military and Revolutionary Guards armed forces, went on to say, "Our developed weapons can hit any part of the Zionist regime."

Firouzabadi was the first senior Iranian military figure to publicly indicate Tehran readiness for the Middle East's first nuclear war. Saturday, Sept. 4, Israeli ambassador in Washington Michael Oren reported that Hizballah had posted in South Lebanon 16,000 rockets, altogether quadrupling the number ranged on the Israeli border four years ago (in violation of UN resolution 1701).
Their range now covered every part of Israel as far south as Eilat with enhanced precision.
This would obviously include Dimona.

In Havana, Fidel Castro again warned that a nuclear conflict was inevitable if the United States, in alliance with Israel, tried to impose international sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program. His speech to students was highlighted by the Iranian media.

A few hours earlier, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told a pro-Palestinian rally that the talks re-launched between Israel and the Palestinians must fail. "The fate of Palestine will be decided through resistance and not in Washington," he declared.

As thousands shouted "Death to America! Death to Israel!" the Iranian president mocked Arab leaders by yelling: "The people of the Middle East are capable of ridding the region of the state of Israel even if their leaders chose not to." He pointed a finger at Abdullah King of Jordan and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who took part in the ceremonial opening of Israel-Palestinian talks in Washington on Sept. 2, for a broad hint that their peoples would rise up against them.
Ahmadinejad then sneered at his favorite targets: "I want to say that no only the Zionists, but even their masters are too small to lay a finger on the Iranian nation and its rights." By' "rights," he referred to Iran's development of nuclear weapons, which he said they were "too small" to halt.

Debkafile's Iranian sources stress that Iranian threats to the Jewish state have becoming increasingly harsh and pugnacious marking their contempt for the Netanyahu government's non-response and what they take as Israel's tacit surrender to the activation of their first nuclear reactor at Bushehr on Aug. 21.